WE SHALL HAVE TO DEFEAT PLUTOCRACY IF INDIA IS TO BE SAVED: SUBHAS CHANDRA PATTANAYAK

Unless plutocracy is defeated, India, as a nation, cannot survive, warned Journalist Subhas Chandra Pattanayak on August 2, in a congregation of intellectuals and social reformers at the State Information Center (Jaya Dev Bhawan), Bhubaneswar. The occasion was Free Speech Day organized by Anti-caste Marriage & One-child Family Organization of India (AMOFOI) and he was the Chief Speaker-cum-Chief Guest.

With Prof. Biswaranjan in the chair, AMOFOI president Joan Omprakash, welcomed the event.

After inaugurating the AMOFOI publication on free speech, Pattanayak recalled Dr. Ambedkar, who, in his reply to debates on the third reading of the Constitution had warned the nation of premature death of democracy if Government of independent India fails to take immediate steps to remove the economic inequality, the country was burdened with, under colonization and feudatory condition.

Sadly, Pattanayak said, the post-independence regimes, instead of removing inequality, have transformed Indian democracy to plutocracy that perpetuate inequality; as a result of which, protests of the victims of inequality are taking the shape of armed revolutions. And, Ambedkar’s forecast is appearing to be coming true.

He elaborated on how agents of the rich are collaborating with each other in covering up crimes against the country so that perpetrators and beneficiaries of plutocracy can consolidate their position. As an instance, he cited the collapse of the motion in the tenth Loksabha against the notorious bank of terror-funding, Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) because of nexus between the Congress in Government and BJP in Opposition.

He cited several instances of how popular governments have no qualms in destroying the faith of people in governance, as both the systems – democracy and plutocracy – being based on elections, look similar and the majority voters – the wretched poor – fail to understand, that, by electing their representatives, they are giving power only to the agents of the rich, planted as they are by all political parties pursuing economy of inequality. The deterioration in ideological sphere is so sharp and severe, that the mainstream communists are also having no qualms in coalescing with the capitalist parties, he said.

In such a situation, aggressive observance of right to free speech by every citizen can put a leash on whosoever occupies office, he opined.

In justifying August 2 to be called the Free Speech Day, he recalled how on August 2, 1971, Orissa High Court had declared two Rules of Orissa Government Servants Conduct Rules void, as they restricted the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 19 (1) (a) of the Constitution.

AMOFOI founder B.Ramachandra, then a lecturer under the State Government, was subjected to disciplinary action for having criticized a government policy.

The Court had set aside the official action with the observation that the government servants shall have the right to criticize the Government , as thereby administration can be cleansed of misrule.

The policy that Ramachandra had criticized had to be abandoned after the Court order, but sadly, the two restrictive rules still stay, despite being declared void. Therefore, observation of Free Speech Day on August 2 every year would act remembrancer of the necessity of writing off the two restrictions imposed on government servants in the conduct rules, said Pattanayak.

The function was presided over by Prof. Biswaranjan who gave a short but specific speech on the essence of freedom of speech.

Advocate Chittaranjan Nanda of Orissa High Court deliberated upon the importance of Article 19(1)(a) of Indian Constitution when Prof. Ramachandra, in his key-note address, stressed on elimination of caste system, of all traces of feudalism and exploitation. He cited John Stuart Mill, Voltaire, Bertrand Russell and Rabindranath Tagore and Universal Declaration of Human Rights in support of free speech campaign and called upon people to be rationalists and humanists rather than becoming religious chauvinists.

Orissa Reshuffle: Supremo Syndrome in Action Again

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Five of the ruling party sycophants, preening in power till Thursday, do no more appear to their sub-sycophants as political stars. They are unceremoniously dropped from the cabinet. So much upset are they by being divested of red-light cars, that, none of them could gather the courage of coming to the Governor House in their private vehicles to witness the induction of nine of their colleagues into the ministry, which could have been an instance of unruffled political curtesy expected of persons fitted into protocols as ex-ministers.

These fellows are: Prafulla Ghadei, Prafulla Samal, Atanu Sabyasachi Nayak, Pratap Jena and Puspendra Singhdeo.

The inducted fellows are Kalpataru Das, Damodar Raut, Bijayashree Rautray, Pratap Keshari Dev, Subrat Tarai, Rajanikant Singh, Sarojini Hembram, Arun Kumar Sahu and Rabinarayan Nanda.

Some of these fellows were earlier dismissed from Naveen Patnaik’s cabinet on charges of corruption, on discernible incompetency, and on over-indulgence in self-projection; whereas one of them is a person, who has shown, how having committed a murder, one can escape the dragnets of law by using the tactics of silencing prosecution.

Relevant is not who is jettisoned, who is inducted.

Relevant is the role of “supremo syndrome” in reshuffle of cabinets.

Whoever has been jettisoned has no hesitation in saying that by complying the Chief Minister’s instructions to resign, he has only honored the order of the supremo.

Whoever has been inducted into the cabinet is attributing the lift to his/her loyalty to the supremo.

This supremo-syndrome is killing democracy. The party to which people have given the mandate is being relegated to irrelevance. On the other hand, ministers in the cabinet are being kept intimidated under constant fear of getting jettisoned, in case any of their action creates any suspicion in the mind of the supremo in matter of personal loyalty.

In such a situation, ‘collective wisdom’ of the cabinet in managing the affairs of the State is getting lost. Autocracy is engulfing democracy under the attire of democracy.

Because of willfully wrong interpretation of constitutional provisions about the prime-ministerial or chief-ministerial role in formation of ministries as personal prerogative of the PM or the CM, the supremo syndrome has taken birth and has divested democracy of consensus politics.

To defeat this danger, the so-called prerogative of the PM or CM in selecting and jettisoning the ministers needs be curbed and constitution of cabinets needs be vested in collective wisdom of the political party, which gets mandate of the people. Till then, the ministers can be viewed as mere sycophants of an individual, and nothing else. Hence there is nothing to rejoice over the reshuffle in Orissa.
It must be kept in mind that supremo concept and democracy are diametrically opposed to each other and can never go together.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 232 other followers