Scribes stress on action against rowdy medicos and IIC of Mangalabag P.S.

Cuttack based scribes belonging to both the print and electronic media, in a signed memorandum to Orissa’s Director General of Police today stressed on action against medicos who kidnapped two reporters of Naxatra News from the medicine indoor of SCB Medical College on June 15 and tortured them in wrongful confinement for more than two hours. They also demanded stern action against the inspector-in-charge of Police of Mangalabag PS for discernible siding with the rowdy medicos.

DSC_0356

Members of the presidium of Media Unity for Freedom of Press (MUFP) Prasanta Patnaik and Subhas Chandra Pattanayak and coordinator of Save the Samaja Forum Pabitra Maharatha accompanied the aggrieved scribes in a major rally to Police headquarters. In absence of the DGP, the memorandum was received by Additional DGP Mr. Sanjib Marik.

tortured journalist briefs the ADGP

The tortured scribes, Chittaranjan Samantray and Debasis Mohanty gave a detail description of how they were shanghaied into wrongful confinement in a hostel of the medical college by a gang of around a hundred medical students and interns and physically tortured. They were forced to kneel down for hours and then forced to proceed to the same medicine indoor for begging apology before the indoor patients before whom on June 14 they had raised objections to what the house surgeons had said about the father of Samantray.

Samantray’s father was admitted into the medicine ward for treatment. The house surgeons pronounced that the senior Samantray had developed damage in both his kidneys and insisted that he should be shifted to a private hospital. Samantray was shocked, because no pathological investigation had indicated about any damage to the kidneys and he protested. This irked the house surgeons and they started rebuking him in filthy language. An embarrassed and shocked Samantray tried to capture the highly atrocious conduct of the medicos; but obstructed, he went to the unit head and professor of medicine, Dr. Siddharth Das and placed before him his grievances. Dr. Das rushed to the spot and investigated into the matter and as all co-patients of the indoor ward corroborated the allegations raised by Samantray, asked the errant medicos not to work in the same ward. This further irritated the medicos.

When next day, June 15, he had come to attend his father, his co-reporter Debasis had also come with him to meet the professor in his indoor chamber in matter of his ailing mother. Seeing them in the indoor corridor, the miscreant medicos jumped on them and whisked them away into the hostel, where they were kept in wrongful confinement and tortured.

The gory part of the incident is that the IIC of Mangalabag Mr. Shariffudin having come to the spot on SOS message from the affected scribe remained a silent spectator of the torture and willfully neglected to register the FIR filed by them and was later seen entertaining the miscreant medicos in his chamber and registering a parallel FIR filed by them in order to create a confusion in course of criminal justice dispensation.

memorandum

About 50 scribes, while collectively presenting their Memorandum, informed the ADGP that the same IIC is terrorizing them and urged upon him to investigate into his conduct and discipline him. Besides the two victims of medico-police atrocity, the memorialists included, amongst others, Pradip Sahu,Navdeep Das,Cittaranjan Mishra, Satchidanand Behera, Gopal Mohapatra, Matrudatta Mohanty,Prasanta Mohanty, Jyotiprakash Rao, Bikash Sharma, Abhi Mohanty, Amardev Nayak, Rajkishore Panda, Pratap Chandra Sahoo, Devi Prasanna Khuntia, Rajkishore Mohanty, Ch. Jagannath Patra, Satyajit Mishra, Saroj Kumar Mallik,Ajaya Kumar Das, Pabitra Maharatha, Prasanta Patnaik and Subhas Chandra Pattanayak.

The ADGP has assured to take suitable action in the matter and expeditiously.

The name Kamakshya Nagar is an insult to the great battle for freedom led by Vir Baisnav: Prof. Abani Baral

vir baisnav

CPI leader Prof. Abani Kumar Baral, in addressing the celebrations of birth centenary of Vir Baisnav Charan Pattanayak at Bhubaneswar on 29 April 2013, has demanded that Kamakshyanagar be re-named Madhi, in memory of the freedom that Pattanayak had given it in leading the people’s war against the tyrant king of the ex-state of Dhenkanal.

The legendary leader of Prajamandal movement had declared war against the king of Dhenkanal and in that war, Madhi was liberated from the pernicious control of the king. So, in the history of India’s freedom movement, Madhi has a unique place. But the shrewd tyrant had wiped out the name of this historic place by changing its name from Madhi to Kamakshyanagar by the name of his son, before abdicating his throne.
Continuance of this name is an insult to the sacred memories of Vir Baisnav as well as to the martyrs this battle had given to the motherland, he pointed out while demanding that the name of Kamakshyanagar be changed back to Madhi.

CPI(M) leader Sivaji Pattanayak, Ex-Minister Prafulla Ghadei, MLA Prafulla Malik, MLA Navin Nanda and Minister Rajanikant Singh also agreed that Kamakshyanagar should be changed to Madhi in view of its historic uniqueness. Jogesh Chandra Tripathy presided over the meeting.

Madhu babu, in whom Gandhiji had his friend, philosopher and guide

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Export of raw materials would help profiteers to exploit the country; but industrial use of the country’s working hands would make the motherland prosperous. So, instead of exporting raw materials, attempts should be made for their industrial utilization inside the country.

This was the essence of politico-economic realization of Madhu babu, the most revered Madhusudan Das of Orissa, whom Gandhiji was looking at as his source of inspiration in formulating his practical economic programs for the masses.

“Over 98 per cent of the population works on land. Land does not grow in area. Hands grow in number with the growth of population”. So, extra-agricultural engagement was needed for people to earn their livelihood and proceed to prosperity, Madhu babu had observed in a speech to Bihar Young Men’s Institute in 1924.

Gandhiji was deeply influenced by this speech. Two years later, on 9-9-1926, he wrote in Young India, “I have kept that speech by me so as to be able to deal with the essential part of it on a suitable occasion”.

In total agreement with Madhu babu’s remarks Gandhiji noted, “the value of his remarks is derived from the fact that, though a lawyer of distinction, he has not only not despised labor with the hands, but actually learned handicrafts at a late period in life, not merely as a hobby, but for the sake of teaching young men dignity of labor and showing that without their turning their attention to the industries of the country the outlook of India is poor. Sjt Das has himself been instrumental in establishing a tannery in Cuttack which has been a centre of training for many a young man who was before a mere unskilled laborer”.

Gandhiji was so much influenced by Madhu babu’s emphasis on utilization of the raw materials in engaging indigenous industries that on 19-6-1927, he wrote in Navajivan that, “raw materials worth crores of rupees are produced in this country and, thanks to our ignorance, lethargy and lack of invention, exported to foreign countries; as Sri Madhusudan Das has pointed out, that we remain ignorant like animals, our hands do not get the training which they ought to and our intellects do not develop as they should. As a consequence, living art has disappeared from our land and we are content to imitate the west”.

India being a land of the farmers and the farming community being cattle dependent, there was enough availability of cattle hides which were being exported to foreign countries, when by industrial use thereof toiling masses were to fetch handsome earning. This is why, Madhu babu, as a demonstrative venture, had established the tannery at Cuttack.

Inspired by him, Gandhiji had established a tannery at Sabarmati Ashram.

I am going to give the copy of Gandhiji’s letter to Madhu babu in this matter, which would show to what extraordinary extent, Gandhiji was influenced by Madhu babu in formulating his practical political economy meant for the masses.

Sent from Sabarmati Ashram to Sjt. Madhusudan Das, Mission Road, Cuttack on March 16, 1928, the letter was thus:

Dear Friend,
After a great deal of thought and bother I have established at the Ashram a little bit of tannery without any power-driven machinery and without skilled assistance saved that of a man who has received a rough-and tumble experience of tanning in America and who is a crank like myself. Though I did not succeed in sharing your troubles and taking the load off your shoulders in connection with your own great national enterprise, your inspiration is partly responsible for the establishment of this little tannery at the Ashram. Can you please help me with a list of literature on the subject, a handbook on tanning and the like? If you think that there is nothing like this in English, will you out of your own wide and varied experience write out something that may be of use for propaganda, just a few hints? What is happening at the tannery? Who is in charge? I may add that my idea is to make the Ashram tannery a model for villages so that the villagers may be able to treat their own dead cattle and make use of the hide themselves. I have asked many people without success as to how I can skin dead cattle. Everybody knowing anything of tanning has something to say about hides after they are received from the village tanner; but nobody has yet told me if I take charge of a dead animal I can skin the carcass economically and hygienically and make use of other contents such as bones, intestine, etc., for purpose of manure.
Yours sincerely,
(M.K.Gandhi)
March 16, 1928

SASWAT PATTANAYAK LAUNCHED HIS FATHER’S NEW BOOK: ANIMADVERSION

Ajay Kumar Mohapatra

animadversion Book Cover

New York based media scholar Saswat Pattanayak launched ‘Animadversion’ , a new book of his father, eminent Journalist Subhas Chandra Pattanayak, in a solemn ceremony on April 8 in the Red Cross Bhawan auditorium at Bhubaneswar. Prof. Biswaranjan was in the chair.

the book unveiled by prof. ajit kumar mohanty

Opening the book, priced Rs.1000/- published by Santosh Publications of Bharat Bharati group of Cuttack, former Professor of J.N.U. New Delhi, Prof. Ajit Kumar Mohanty commended it as a “priceless piece of journalistic literature” that helps living history by covering milestone moments of contemporary India, with specific focus on matters relating to Orissa.

To Prof. Jayant Kumar Biswal, Chief Speaker of the event, the book is a precious piece of principled journalism that unveils unseen scenarios, which affect the society.

Prof J.Biswal speaking on the book

When it throws new light on authors of the Charyagitis (Bauddha Gan O Doha) establishing the fact that by birth they belong only to Orissa, thereby demolishing the Bengali claim over them, as in the case also of poet Jay Dev, the book has exposed the monstrous mischief and treachery the politicians in power and the mandarins in office have played against the people, he said. He lauded the author for his commitment to the people’s right to be informed as evidenced in depiction of research based factual analysis in all the articles compiled in Animadversion.

lokarpana

As a token of commencement of the book’s circulation (Lokarpana), Biswajit Mohanty, a pioneer in global-utility-education-movement in Orissa received the book from Saswat Pattanayak on the dais. Mohanty is a grand son of late Madhu Mohanty,the most popular columnist of his time in Orissa.

Biswajit after receiving the book

On receiving the book in ‘Lokarpana’, Biswajit informed the audience how he had come across an exposure on a well known person of the State in Subhas babu’s writings much ahead of the CBI taking the same person to books for the same offense. He welcomed the publication of Animadversion as the book would help non-netizen persons to know the author’s online contributions to the cause of the country.

saswat addresses the audience

In presenting the book, Saswat, associated with orissamatters.com from where the articles compiled in Animadversion are picked up, described the book as “inimitably inspiring and unquestionably valuable, both in terms of content and, in its approach”.

SCP on his  book

Author Subhas Chandra Pattanayak recalled how orissamatters.com that gave birth to a new era of Internet journalism in Orissa was established. When scope for standing truthfully with the people was “shrinking” around 1999, his son had inspired him into the new generation journalism, leading to creation of orissamatters.com, he said. “This new platform gave me enough independence to write as prudence entailed to be written in public interest. For every piece of my posting in orissamatters.com, I have searched for facts to the best of my ability and have used my long experience and professional wisdom to help people know what the agents of plutocracy have always wanted to keep buried under the carpet of mediacracy” informed Sri Pattanayak.

prof. biswaranjan

In his Presidential speech, Prof. Biswaranjan praised the author for his unperturbed role as a people’s sentinel even in the environment prevalent in India, where the media is increasingly getting more infested with devotion to rich man’s rule than the common man’s sovereignty.

Prof. Major Kumudini Barai proposed vote of thanks when Amrita Mishra had welcomed the guests.

Media consultant Pabitra Maharatha coordinated the event.

Republic to note: Gandhiji was disillusioned and Ambedkar had cried a caution

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

When India got her freedom, Gandhiji was on fasting, which was his unique method for protest against any discernible deviation from ideals.

In refusing to celebrate the day by giving the people a message to that effect, he had told an officer of Information and broadcasting department who had come to him for the message, that he had “run dry”.

January 26 being the day on which we had, despite bondage, declared our independence, how had he observed the first 26th of January that had come after our freedom on August 15, 1947? I will quote relevant portion of his prayer-address on this day from ‘MAHATMA’.

“This day, 26 January, is our independence day. This observance was quite appropriate when we were fighting for independence we had not seen nor handled. Now! We have handled it and we seem to be disillusioned. At least I am, even if you are not” (Volume 8, p.279).

So, our leaders “handled” our freedom in such a style that the principal architect of our independence, the father of our nation, Gandhiji, was “disillusioned”.

How had January 26, the day we now celebrate as our Republic Day, come?

It had come as a day of “contradiction” in the words of the father of the Republic, Dr. Ambedkar (CAD, Vol.XI,p.979).

“On 26th January 1950, we are going to enter into a life of contradiction. In politics, we will have equality and in social and economic rights we will have inequality. In politics we will be recognizing the principle of one man one vote, one value. In our social and economic rights we shall by reason of our social and economic structure, continue to deny one man one value”, he had confessed.

The Government, after our freedom, had denied the working class its legitimate role in constitution making by banning the Communist Party of India. This had helped the class of property proprietors to dominate in the Constituent Assembly. Therefore the equality for which our martyrs had sacrificed their lives, Gandhiji had his dreams, and the people had forced the British to quit the country, had no existence in the concept of the Constitution. Ambedkar, however, was hopeful that the first Parliament that the people were to elect, would correct the wrong done by the Assembly and remove the contradiction immediately.

“We must remove the contradiction at the earliest possible moment or else those who suffer from inequality will blow up the structure of political democracy which this Assembly has so laboriously built up”, he has told. (Ibid)

Instead of removing the contradiction, the compradors in power have transformed Indian democracy to plutocracy.

If we love our Republic, we shall have to remove the compradors from power and to force the Government to promulgate social ownership over means of production and entire wealth of the nation. Otherwise, as Ambedkar had predicted, there shall be no Republic in future.

Suspected Hijackers of ‘The Samaja’ use tricks to project themselves as genuine

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Orissa’s premier daily newspaper ‘The Samaja’ is in severe danger as its suspected hijackers have been using tricks to project themselves as its genuine owners. Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose is being made the medium of their latest trick.

January 23 is the birthday of Netaji.

Cuttack was not only his birthplace, but also was his character-setter. That he emerged as an epitome of militant patriotism in Gandhi’s India is only because he had spent his first fifteen years in Cuttack under the influence of the Barabati Fort beaming rays of valor that the people of Orissa personify.

The first fifteen years are most crucial in the formation and stabilization of human character. On and from the sixteenth year, man’s character doesn’t usually change. So, Kautilya Chanakya had opined that the day a son enters the sixteenth year in age; the father should treat him as a friend; because he would no further change in character thereafter. “Praptesu sodasa varse putram mitramibacharet”, he had said. And Subhas Chandra was the only one amongst the sons of Janakinath Bose to have lived his first fifteen years in Cuttack.

The history of Orissa’s valiant battle against the Muslim, even when Bengal had surrendered to them, was putting its heroic impact on Subhas.

The Muslims, by then having established their empire all over India including Bengal were facing the greatest obstacle to grab the whole soil because of the matchless militant patriotism of the people of Orissa.

In describing the defeat that the Muslim Army had been thrown into in its aggression against Orissa, the Muslim historian Minhaj-i-Siraj, who himself was a part of the Muslim Army in that war, had noted, “A greater disaster had not till then befallen the Muslims in any part of Hindustan” (The history of Bengal, Muslim period: Dr. K. R. Quanungo, 1973, pp.48-52).

Long thereafter, when the British grabbed India, the same valiant patriotism of the people of Orissa had also overwhelmed the foreigners in the first ever battle for freedom in the soil of India. In ‘A sketch of the history of Orissa’, the British historian G. Toynbee has described this encounter in the following words: “It was not long, however, before we had to encounter a storm which burst with so sudden fury as to threaten our expulsion”.

In reporting this first freedom struggle of India, Magistrate W. Forrester had, on 9.9.1818, told Commissioner Robert Ker, “the nature of the country (Orissa) and disposition of the inhabitants (the Oriyas) will always present formidable obstacle to the suppression of these disturbances either by military or police”.

So, Subhas Bose was shaped by Orissa in the climate of militant patriotism that her children epitomize.

Its reflection was seen when he assaulted Prof. Oaten for his anti-India utterances that led to his expulsion from the Presidency College, Calcutta, where he was pursuing his studies after matriculation from the Ravenshaw Collegiate School, Cuttack.

Therefore, for the people of Orissa, Netaji Subhas, being the creation of their militant patriotism, is the object of their patriotic pride. Come January 23, every patriotic Oriya feels pleased to celebrate his birthday.

The suspected hijackers of The Samaja are trying to exploit this emotional attachment of the Oriyas for Netaji this January 23.

The trap

The trap is very shrewdly laid; but appears very innocent.

Student leaders are being organized to attend State level conference at Cuttack to accept felicitations on the occasion of Netaji’s birthday. The trap is designed to start with garlanding the statue of Netaji in the College Square from where a rally dedicated to Netaji would proceed for its destination at Gopabandhu Bhavan, presently under occupation of the suspected hijackers of the Samaja, where they would hear orations by a select group of persons on relevance of Netaji.

But these orators do not know that they would be used as mere masks as the suspected hijackers of The Samaja are eager to hide their ugly faces behind those masks.

To understand the phenomenon, we are to see how The Samaja has been hijacked and why the beneficiaries of this nasty offense are eager to hide behind the masks.

The Samaja

The Samaja was founded by Utkalmani Pandit Gopabandhu Das with the monetary help given by the people of Orissa. When alive, he was next only to Utkal Gourav Madhusudan Das in stature as a leader of the land.

But, despite that, he had failed to extricate himself from the circle of a syndicate of caste supremacists, who, because of greed, had an eye on his prize property that included the Samaja and its publishing house, the Satyavadi Press.

Gopabandhu became bedridden in June 1928 and did not respond to treatments and all the hopes of his survival dwindled day by day.

The members of the syndicate of caste supremacists that had constituted a cocoon around him, taking the advantage of his bedridden condition, started spreading information that they were his most trusted associates.

This is why, when Gopabandhu died, sentinels of the then Orissa like Utkal Dipika and Asha also accepted the syndicate’s version that before breathing his last, Utkalmani had given away the Samaja and Satyavadi Press to the Servants of the People Society (SoPS), of which he was a top leader, by way of a WILL.

And, thereafter it was seen that active members of the syndicate, under the cover of SoPS became reigning deities in the Samaja set up and rose in political stature by usurping the tremendous popularity of the late leader, Pandit Gopabandhu.

Since then the people had a belief that Gopabandhu had given away the Samaja and Satyavadi Press to the SoPS by his last WILL.

The Fake WILL

Only a few months ago we stumbled upon a document that gave birth to a suspicion that Gopabandhu had NOT given away the Samaja and Satyavadi Press to the SoPS by way of a WILL before breathing his last. The WILL that formed the base of ownership of SoPS over the Samaja was apparently a fake WILL.

As the exposure was made in these pages, admirers of Gopabandhu immediately jerked into action and wanted the SoPS to clarify its position in view of the exposure.

Instead of displaying in public the WILL of Gopabandhu, if any, in original, so as to undo the shock of the exposure, the SoPS indulged in such shenanigans that the suspicion became more defined. The admirers of Gopabandhu formed a forum called “Save the Samaja Forum” that in a press conference called upon the SoPS authorities to remove the suspicion by producing the original WILL, if any, in public.

If the Will of Gopabandhu was forged as suspected, the hijackers of the Samaja have swindled away hundereds of crores of rupees from the Samaja income, which belongs to Orissa, the Forum alleged. The SoPS, instead of clarifying its position vis-à-vis the raised doubt, forced the editor of the Samaja to blackout the press conference of the Forum and, on the other hand, to use news space to denigrate the Forum leadership.

SoPS too allegedly hijacked

At this stage it transpired that, the SoPS has also been hijacked by a pack of tainted members, who were facing disciplinary action on charges of corruption and embezzlement of the funds of the Samaja. These tainted members have contrived the trick to use the speakers who would address the January 23 event as well as Netaji Subhas as masks in their attempt to appear as genuine.

When the names of Manubhai Patel, Rajkumar , Deepak Malaviya, Bhimsen Yadav, Prasannavadan Mehta, and Niranjan Rath appear in the program sheet – spread by one Pravas Acharya posing as Secretary of SoPS (Cuttack) – as President, Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, Exe. member and Exe. Member of SoPS respectively, records show that none of them has yet established the legitimacy of occupation of such positions in the Court that is hearing the allegations against them as well as in the police stations where cases against them have been registered.

On the other hand, as confirmed member of SoPS, they are bound by its constitution “to lead a pure personal life”. Let us look at each of them against the backdrop of this requirement.

Manubhai Patel:

He was found to be a man of dubious character by the then President of SoPS and editor of the Samaja, late Radhanath Rath. In his letter dated 3/2/1985 to Sevakramji, Rath had noted that despite “repeated requests” he was not refunding the “huge money” that he had taken “from the Orissa branch for his election expenses”. Describing the conduct of Manubhai as “very unfortunate”, Rath in the same letter expressed strong disliking for “his character” while saying that he was being “blamed for him in Orissa”.

resolution against manubhai patelPatel was held guilty of misuse of his position and was removed from the post of President of SoPS in an extraordinary meeting on 9/6/2011 by all but one members of the General Body that elected Onkar Chand as the President in his place. Reacting to allegations of criminal offenses for which prosecution against Manubhai was sought for in a case before the Orissa High Court, the GB had held that much damage had already been done to the reputation and image of SoPS by his wrongful activities.

Rajkumar:

He is charge-sheeted vide 2012/SP02/July 5, 2012 for having manipulated minutes and records of the society to fulfill his selfish purpose. Being confirmed as a life member of SoPS on 1/4/1992, his membership has expired on 31/3/2012. Thereafter he is alleged to have illegally overstayed as a life member and a functionary through manipulations and in blatant disregard to the stipulations laid down in the Society’s constitution.

Deepak Malviya:

He is charge-sheeted under SoPS letter dated 27/6/2010 for “serious misconduct” discernible in “manipulation of minutes/documents of meetings … on different occasions” and for sanction of “Rs.20 lakhs to the GIMSAR without due authority”.

Bhimsen Jadav:

He is also charge-sheeted under identical orders for offenses similar to that committed by Malaviya. Allegations of massive misappropriation of funds, financial loss caused to SoPS by manipulation of accounts of a farm situated at Panipat comprising over 144 Acres of land placed under his care, manipulation of records to sell away 11 Acres of the Panipat land with ulterior motive etc are also placed before the Officer-in-charge of Economic Offenses Wing of Haryana Police as well as in the Panipat Police Station, on July 13, 2012.

Prasannavadan Mehta:

He is a co-accused in the criminal case lodged by Sourav Sahu for “misappropriation of funds from the account of ‘The Samaja’ by means of fraud, forgery and cheating”. And the matter is pending since April 2011. It is noteworthy that the employees of the Samaja, in their Association letter No. 41/GS/10 dated 24/1/2011, have also raised serious allegations against Mehta in the matter of purchase of newsprint, exposing him as vested interest with his son as an agent of a newsprint dealer . ‘The Samaja’ being a highly heavy consumer of newsprint as Orissa’s top circulated multi-editional daily with many sister publications, the transaction is worth several hundred crores of Rupees. And, choice of the supplier of newsprint gets done through corrupt practices, a chunk of which had made Justice Arijit Pasayat committee, appointed to enquire into corrupt practices in management of the Samaja, suggest specific action against member Niranjan Rath and GM Hemanta Sahu. The employees had alleged that Mehta was supporting Sahu because of a secret deal with him in his son’s context. As Manubhai Patel was then the President of SoPS and he was addressed to the allegation against Mehta, the nexus between them both, had given a snubbing to the employees allegation. But the allegation still stands.

Niranjan Rath

To me personally it is paining to write about him, he being a dear personal friend for many decades since my days in Athgarh. At that time I believed that he was a crusader against corruption. But under the climatic impact of SoPS, he has perhaps degenerated into a condition where corruption finds it easier to inscribe its signature.

He was charged for theft of money by a reputed colleague, Journalist Prados Pattanayak, who has retired from the Samaja on superannuation in the post of news editor. Pattanayak’s allegation has been registered as a cognizable offense u/s 380 IPC generating case No. 15/03 on 12.3.2003.

dismissal of niranjan rathThe Executive Council of SoPS had had a discussion on him in its meeting at Puri held on 11/11/2005, consequent upon which he was terminated as a life worker on 22/11/2005.

How and why and by whom under what circumstances he was recruited again and got confirmed as a life member is a mystery. But the Committee of Inquiry headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat has found him guilty of moral turpitude at least in two counts. The Report of this committee was “unanimously accepted” by the Executive Council of SoPS in its meeting on 28/2/2011 at Baroda.

In this report, the Enquiry Committee has observed in the context of Niranjan, that, “a life member (of SoPS) is mandated to maintain pure personal life, but if any member is of objectionable character and reputation, it is against the interest of the society; and therefore, his life-membership has to be terminated”.

Such is “pure personal life” in the parlance of SoPS that these fellows are projecting themselves as functionaries thereof as indicated supra!

Pravas Acharya

The Constitution of SoPS doesn’t bear any provision for a post that he has brandished in the program card he has circulated.

denial to p.acharyaBefore becoming even a worker, Acharya was using the name of SoPS even though he was not entitled to do so. Therefore, on 2/2/2010 he was warned by the President of SoPS.

“Please do not use the name of Lok Sevak Mandal (which is SoPS) till you are accepted as a life worker”, Sri Manubhai Patel, as the President of SoPS, had warned him.

Patel had made it clear that, in order to become a member, Acharya was to work as a life worker first for three years on probation, and another three years under training.

After six years, he was to be put under observation, and if the Executive Council feels that he was fit to be a life worker, then he was to earn confirmation as a life worker before being considered for elevation to rank of life member.

“Till then do not use the name of Lok Sevak Mandal” he had warned Acharya again.

Obviously, Acharya was illegally using the name of SoPS even without being a worker, which had provoked Patel to issue him the warning while refusing him ready entry into the society.

So, the self projection of Acharya as the secretary of SoPS, Cuttack with display of the names of Manubhai Patel, Rajkumar , Deepak Malaviya, Bhimsen Yadav, Prasannavadan Mehta, and Niranjan Rath in the invitation for the convention on January 23 indicates that he is now the front man of the gang of six who want to use Netaji as their mask to hoodwink the people of Orissa in the matter of hijacking ‘The Samaja’.

Sad, some respected persons like Smt. Tulasi Munda, Baijayant Panda, Pradyumna Satpathy, Nrusingh Kar, Prasad Harichandan, Chittaranjan Mohanty, Akshyaya Das, Dr.Purnachandra Mohapatra, and Prof. Suryanarayan Mishra have fallen in their trap to make people be misled to accept these hijackers of the Samaja as genuine owners thereof.

But should they continue in their trap?

Orissa Government should explain how Stemcor completed 95% of its Project sans Entitlement

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Law never allows any ore-based industrial project to proceed without forest clearance.

But Stemcor, a foreign private company established in U.K. and engaged in collection of raw materials from “minehead” to supply of the same to “factory floor” of steel producers in 45 countries across the globe, has completed 95% of its project in Orissa to flume away Baitarani water to use in conversion of ore fines to iron pellets, behind the back of the people and sans entitlement

Orissa Government run by Naveen Patnaik has suppressed this fact of foreign ownership and has shown it as a company of Orissa origin.

The MoU signed with this foreign firm on 15 March 2007 mentions “M/s Brahmani River Pellets Limited (BRPL), a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Plot No. 3915, Lewis Road, Kedargouri square, Bhubaneswar 751014” as the company to which the government has given guarantee of its cooperation. This is therefore clear that the Orissa Government has co-operated with the foreign company Stemcor in appearing before the people of Orissa as a registered company of their own soil. When BRPL is “a wholly owned Stemcor project” why the name of Stemcor is not at all mentioned in the MoU needs be explained by the Government.

Suppression of this vital information from people of Orissa is an offense that raises many questions on motive of the firm and its accountability as well as on the conduct of the Government.

Orissa is now considered by foreign profit mongers as such a grazing ground that Stemcor disposed of 90% of its holding in the Savage River iron ore mine, which it had acquired in 2005 in Australia, only in order to invest the money in Orissa in 2007 under the style of BRPL. A very senior IAS officer confides in me that Stemcor agents had met Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik in January 2007 and several times thereafter. On being sure of his support, the company had disposed of its share in the Australian firm to grab Orissa as its grazing ground.

What would it do in Orissa?

It shall act a scavenger of mining offals for pelletization; but thereby shall eliminate every scope for the State to use the ore fines in future.

Its project comprises a 4 MTPA iron ore pelletization complex involving 4.7 MTPA beneficiation plant at Tonto, Nalda in the district of Keonjhar, a 4 MTPA pelletization plant in Kalinga Nagar Industrial Complex, Duburi in the district of Jajpur, and an iron ore slurry pipeline connecting the two plants. It shall flume away the water of Baitarani for this purpose.

The Water Resources Department held by Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik is to supply water from River Baitarani “for its construction needs, operation of the plants, as well as auxiliary requirement for services and related facilities” when the approximate requirement of water will be 480 cum/hr from Baitarani during construction and operation of Beneficiation Plant.

Water is no property of the Government

The owner of a property can sell away the same to anybody of his choice. But, one, who is not the owner, cannot do it.

No law of the country has made any government the owner of natural resources including rivers or natural bodies of water. When natural resources belong to the people for all future generations to come, the Government is supposed to manage the natural resources just as a trusty of the people. But Orissa Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik has been acting as the owner and arbitrarily disposing of mines, lands and waters of Orissa in total disregard to needs of the present and future generations of the people. River Baitarani is the latest victim of this mischief.

Baitarani, the flowing testimony of Orissa’s glowing past

Orissa’s past was unique; because Buddha, born here, had not only applied Orissa’s tribal societal practice of democratic centralism in his Samgha system, but also had organized the tribal people of north India in the Orissa model to obstruct empire building in the heartland of Vedic Imperialism at Magadha, in order to save the then Orissa from imperial onslaught. Generations after, the wicked Asoka of Magadha has attacked Orissa to avenge the defeat of his forefathers and to desecrate Buddha’s birthplace to shatter the fountainhead of Buddhism. The matriarch people of Orissa – for which history does not know the king, if any, of Kalinga who had faced the Magadhan aggressor – had collectively fought the battle against Asoka and contrary to wrong noting in the history misled by Asoka and his cohorts, had vanquished him and allowed him to go back with his life only after he agreed to accept Buddhism as his creed. The area, where the Kalinga War was fought, is the land where Muni Kapila was residing. His birthplace is Kapileswar in the Dhauli giri region, where the people of Sakya clan live. Sankhya – the philosophy of Kapila – might have been derived from Sakya or the vice versa. But the rationalistic approach of Sankhya is sic passim in the system of Buddhism. Buddha who belonged to Aditya sub-clan of Sakya was born also in the Kpilavastu – the reddish soil region – under the Dhauligiri. In Encyclopedia of Religions and Ethics, at page 189 of Vol.XI, Gorbe observes that Sankhya “may be attributed to the same district of India as produced Buddhism”. Slowly and steadily history is being corrected to accept that Buddhism was produced in Orissa. If Kapila was the ancient sage to whom oblation is paid in Pitr Paksha, Orissa is viewed as the land of the Pitr or Pitr Desha. Because of being the land of Buddha it is also known as the land of the sinless. From Northern India, entrance into this land spread under the Dhauligiri, comprising the Prachi Valley and on the embankment of River Daya, one is to cross the River Baitarani that flows on the northern portion of Orissa. So, India’s greatest epic Mahabharata has said, “Ganga acquires the name of Baitarai, as only beyond her, is situated the sinless land of the ancients, the Pitr Desha [the modern Orissa]” (Adi Parva, 169/22).

Baitarani is one of India’s most revered rivers whom Mahabharata has given much importance. The greatest epic further describes it as “a river that enhances the strength of the Lord of Waters [Baruna]” (Sabha Parva, 9/20); “she absolves all sins, as by bathing in it at Biraja Tirtha [Jajpur], one glows like the moon” ( Bana Parva, 55/6); “she is one of those rivers of Bharat [India] the water of which the people of the entire country directly drink” (Visma Parva, 9/34).

But this river of pure potable water is ruined due to unrestrained industrial exploitation.

Ruined under the rule of Naveen

In the last decade, under the rule of Naveen Patnaik, as many as 108 mines, covering 290 sqr.kms lease area, 24 sponge iron units and 250 crushing units have spread over the Baitarani river valley drawing enormous water from its basin to elutriate the ores and to run the factories. The famous river is now severely affected by industrial pollution and pillage

Thanks to Shree Murli Manohar Sharma and his Advocate Shree Bibhu Prasad Tripathy, a hope against hope is somewhat being generated that the ancient river may get a reprieve from the labyrinth of industrial exploitation.

Sharma, socio-politically involved with the people, belongs by birth to Barbil in the district of Keonjhar and therefore, emotionally worried over ruin of the revered river.

bptTripathy, a National Law School of India product, is as proficient in his profession as devoted to causes of Orissa and her people. He is representing Sharma in Case No. 60/2012 before the National Green Tribunal to save the River Baitarani from pernicious industrial exploitation in the best interest of the people of Orissa, who are in deep anguish over their state government siding with industries in causing irreparable injuries to their unique eco-systems and rivers of pure potable waters.

It is absolutely shocking that the State government is cooperating in industrial exploitation of Baitarani. If the foreign firm Stemcor (BRPL) is not said ‘no’ to flume away its water, the riparian community will severely perish.

Riparian people to suffer the worst

The Industrial exploitation of Baitarani has seriously affected a population of 17.55 lakhs in 2432 villages under 16 riparian blocks in the Baitarani basin comprising five districts namely, Keonjhar, Mayurbhanj, Bhadrak, Jajpur, and Kendrapara. A huge population comprising 19 % of the dwellers of the five districts use the Baitarani water directly for drinking. They all shall perish if Stemcor (BRPL) is not stopped; as it shall consume huge water in elutriating the ore fines.

Zilla Parisad resolution gone in vain

Against this backdrop and in utter disappointment over the difficulties that industrial use of Baitarani is causing to the people, the Keonjhar Zilla Parisad in its meeting on 01 February, 2010 had resolved not to allow any companies to draw water from upstream of Baitarani. But, when the Government sides with the eco-destroyers, the Zilla Parisad resolution went in vain.

Interim order of National Green Tribunal

Sharma has filed the case against M/S. Brahmani River Pallets Ltd. But in a tremendously eco-friendly order applicable to all the industries, the National Green Tribunal of India has prohibited use of water from river Baitarani in contravention of the agreement or contrary to “the purpose for which clearance has not been granted”.

It has ordered that, M/S. Brahmani River Pallets Ltd (BRPL) “shall not go ahead with construction of the project without obtaining Environment Clearance.

But the State Government, that has pledged itself to obtain the clearance for the shadow company has not been stopped from using its power for a foreign firm.

Treachery by the Government against the people

The State Government knows well that BRPL will serve no purpose of Orissa in matter of economic uplift. It aims at processing iron ore fines into high grade concentrates which can then be used for pelletization to use in the steel making process in 45 foreign countries. Orissa shall not be the beneficiary of its pelletization. But the people of Orissa shall continue to suffer loss of electricity for benefit of this trading company, as for the Beneficiation plant at Tonto, it will consume 18.5 MW power and for the Pellet plant, it will consume equal MWs. Thus 37MW power will be diverted every day from the grid of Orissa when the State has no scope to use its product and people are perishing under power cuts. This is a treachery the State government is pledged to play against the people.

Ever since Naveen Patnaik has grabbed power, Orissa is being mercilessly denuded of her natural wealth by private and foreign industries. How the government has been helping them to hoodwink the laws, as and when occasion arises, is viewable in what the above firm has told the Tribunal.

It obtained “an in-principle approval from the Works department for laying of iron ore slurry pipelines on 13.06.2007 within three months of signing the MoU.

In the next month on 19.07.2007 it got permission for laying the pipeline alongside State highway No.10.

The State Pollution Control Board rushed its consent for its iron ore beneficiation plant and pipeline laying on 29.08,2007 and the national highway chief engineer also allowed it on 7.12.2007 to lay pipelines in NH 215.

The Water Resources department administered by the Chief Minister allocated 4.70 cusecs water from river Baitarani with effect from 11.02.2009 and a week thereafter, on 19.02.2009, the State Government bagged for it environment clearance from the Union Ministry of Environment and Forest.

In October that year, on 14.10.2009, the State Government bound the Governor in an agreement with it to supply 4.70 cusecs of water from Baitarani keeping him in dark about the requirement of water by the riparian people, even though by that date the company had not applied for clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act for diversion of forest lands for non-forest use in setting up the beneficiation and construction of pipelines.

So, it is clear that, before the firm applied for forest clearance, the State Government had allocated its required water on 11.02.2009 and organized for it forest clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forest on 19.02.2009 and on 14.10.2009, it had misled the State Governor to be bound by an agreement with the firm for supply of its required water. One has reasons to suspect, in view of this, that the State Government has been dancing to the tune of this foreign firm.

However, in course of time, under exigencies of Law, on 27.06.2011, the Forest Range Officer of Barbil had directed this firm to stop work in view of absence of forest clearance. But as works reportedly continued, the Collector of Keonjhar District had to use his authority to stop the work.

The company has informed the Tribunal that, on receipt of the notice to stop work, it had instantly complied with the same. But by then, approximately 95% of its project was completed.

The company itself has stated that the “Central Government granted Stage-1 forest clearance on 02.11.2011 for the beneficiation plant and pipeline. The Stage-2 clearance for the beneficiation plant was granted on 09.07.2012 and the Stage-2 clearance for the pipeline was granted on 17.08.2012”.

If this is the position, how has the company completed “approximately 95% of the project” before receiving the work-stop order on 27.06.2011 from the Forest Range Officer? Obviously, it has almost completed the project without entitlement.

Does not the Chief Minister owe an answer to the people on this score?

Illegalities galore

intake well on Baitarani

It is absolutely baffling that when the project had been put to stop because of lack of forest clearance, the area water resources S.D.O. had to submit a report to the Executive Engineer stating that “the construction work at the intake well site by BRPL was as per the approved drawings” while certifying that the “water conductor system in which BRPL would draw water from Baitarani river was feasible and the construction of the intake well would not affect the natural flow of Baitarani river”.

construction on forest landconstructuin in forest area

Thus it is clear that the company was going ahead with its construction even after the work-stop notice from the Collector of Keonjhar.

As outcry over misuse of Baitarani by this company is rising, it now asserts that the water from the river “will only be used primarily during the non-lean period”. There is no mention at all in the MoU that the State Government shall have the lock and key to control the flume into the slurry pipelines and the intake well during the lean period.

So it is a treachery being played by the government of Naveen Patnaik against the people of Orissa.

In the case filed by Sharma, it is adopting technicalities to escape. Law of limitation, non-prosecution under the Irrigation Act etc are ploys in use.

But I wonder why the State government is not rising to the occasion? Why individuals – Sharma or anybody – should exhaust their purse and energy in filing and pursuing cases against this company in the NGT?

forest being denuded of trees

Without any entitlement to do any construction work in absence of forest clearance, it has been denuding the forest of trees and has done immense damage to the eco-system. It has looted the most valuable trees and sold them away apparently in the black market. The forest department of Government of Orissa has apparently been forced by the political leadership to keep mum or has been gained over by the company quite. Otherwise, unauthorized tree cutting could have been interfered with and criminal action against the company for the felony should have started.

Either it is the State that has been hoodwinked by this company or it is this company that has committed illegalities by completing approximately 95% of the project sans eligibility, in total disregard to legal stipulations.

So, the State must ban this company on the ground of its illegalities and must file prosecutions against it for contravention of environmental laws and unauthorized loot of its forest.

It is essential to deny this company the water from Baitarani and to refuse to renew the MoU.

It is a fit case for study how the State suffers when compradors control administration.

Replacement of R with D is a wrong against Oriya Language

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

D and R_ situational use
Replacement of R by D in the English spelling of Orissa’s name and language by a law is a wrong that adversely affects its archaic uniqueness.

After consistent stress in these pages of ORISSA MATTERS on necessity of preservation of classicism of Oriya language, a section of Oriya authors and scholars have started speaking for recognition of Oriya as a classical language.

The Government of India has recognized Telugu as a classical language in 2008. But Linguistic Survey of India has recognized Oriya as a richer language than Telugu. To quote it, “The Oriya language can boast of a rich vocabulary in which respect neither Bengali nor Hindi nor Telugu can vie with it. The richness of the vocabulary is the index by which the vastness of a vernacular can be gauged” (Vol.IV).

“Oriya has preserved a great many archaic features in both grammar and pronunciation” has said famous linguist Prof. Suniti Kumar Chatterjee in I.H.Q. Vol.XXIII, 1947.p.337.

Replacement of R by D has ruined this “archaic feature”.

As Chatterjee has noted, Oriya is an ancient language of India that has “preserved a great many archaic features” and, as Linguistic Survey of India has determined, it is so vast in vocabulary that Telugu cannot vie with it.

If Telugu became a classical language in 2008, why Oriya is left behind?

This is because, Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik, whose mother tongue is not Oriya and who has no knowledge about the “high antiquity” quality of Oriya language, which is the cardinal condition for recognition of a language as classical, had by then started playing the mischief against this quality of the language.

Instead of demanding for recognition of Oriya language as a classical language of India, Naveen had made his followers in the Assembly adopt a Resolution on 28th August, 2008 to change the name of Orissa to Odisha oblivious of how adversely that was to affect the “high antiquity” quality of Oriya language. So, instead of Oriya language, Telugu earned the status of classical language.

Naveen, who has killed the soul of Orissa by forcing its people into displacement to handover their lands and living environment to the non-Oriya – even foreign – industrial houses, was in dire need of something to show the people that he is not anti-Oriya. The alteration of Orissa’s name was contrived to help him in this regard. On this mischievous measure metamorphosing into a law with supportive constitutional amendment, Naveen was so relaxed that official holiday was declared to celebrate it as a victory and the entire administrative machinery was misused to project him as the greatest epitome of Oriya nationalism by squandering away, on the occasion, the State exchequer in propaganda and fireworks.

It is a shame that the supporters of the “alteration” who feel “proud” over the change of the English spelling of Orissa and Oriya to Odisha and Odia, in the name of Oriya nationalism, are not ashamed of the very fact that their mother tongue has lost its primacy as the official language in Orissa in the administration of Naveen Patnaik, even though the State’s Official Language Act 1954 that had made use of Oriya language compulsory in official works, is 15 years senior to Official Language Act framed by the Union Government for India and their motherland is also the first amongst all the States of India to have been formed as a province on the basis of its language.

However, it is to be noted that some of my friends are of the opinion that the letter constituting the crux of my discussion has no two situational shapes; but the two shapes are of two different letters acting as two different phonemes.

The set of Oriya alphabets depicted by old Oriya dictionaries, given below, is capable of making the position clear.
oriya alphabets

The greatest ever encyclopedic lexicon of Oriya language, ‘Purnnachandra Ordia Bhashakosha’, in distinguishing the two different situational uses of the concerned letter says, it is “the 13th consonant and the third letter of the “Ta’ series (cerebral), corresponding to the‘d’ sound. When it occurs at the beginning of Oria words it is pronounced as in day and when at the end or middle of a word, it is pronounced as rd in hird”.D We find ‘rd’ evolving into ‘r’ in writings of the leaders of Utkal Sammilani to whom we owe resurrection of our motherland that was deliberately and diplomatically divided into four separate limbs by the British because of its fear for the “disposition” of the inhabitants of this brave land, which, its area authorities were sure, “will always present formidable obstacles to suppression either by military or police” (Report of W. Forrester to Robert Ker, Dt. 9.9.1918).

The Law to change Orissa to Odisha and Oriya to Odia is a legal mischief to do away with this distinction and hence is a bad law that no Oriya, who loves the richness of his ancient vocabulary and respects the “high antiquity” quality of his beloved mother tongue, can ever obey.

For us, it would continue to be a matter of pride to disobey the Law that replaces R with D in international spelling of the names of our motherland and language: Orissa and Oriya.

A Comment from an esteemed visitor and my Reply

I have received a comment on my continuing opposition to change of the English spelling of my motherland and mother tongue from an esteemed reader Sri Deba Prasad Parija. I could have replied to him on the dashboard itself. But, as I feel that it would be better if the debate continues, I deem it proper to post my reply on the major area of my page. So, here it is.

Sri Parija has written:

So we should change our pronunciation as the foreigners pronounce? If not then what wrong to correct the mispronunciation. I am sorry to tell some time we try to show our knowledge. Why we bother how Britishers call us, we have got them out and now time to correct our names. You may accept or not but 99.999999…%Odia has approved it even before the Bill was passed. Bande Utkal Janani.

My reply is:

Dear Sri Parija,
Thanks for the time given to the article.

You have perhaps not gone into the articles linked to this article and therefore, wrongfully attributed Orissa or Oriya to pronunciation by foreigners.

D and R_ situational use

From “Ordia” as in Purnachandra Bhashakosha to “Oriya” as developed by founding fathers of our resurrected State, our own pronunciation of D used in second and onward position in an Oriya word has evolved into the shape of this transliteration, when Oriya had attracted foreigners’ attention and our founding fathers – Kulabruddha Madhusudan Das et al – had the need to project Orissa before the foreign community.

Orissa and Oriya are the names in which our founding fathers had decided our motherland and mother tongue to be mentioned in English.

And, their decision was based on their pride in the archaic uniqueness of our language, that they had wanted the world to know.

The Kera-Oriya Naveen Patnaik, who, despite being in power for so many years, has not learned our language as yet, and his sycophants in the cabinet and the Assembly, and packs of habitual order carriers in bureaucracy and fellows in Parliament that do not know anything of the uniqueness of Oriya language have played this mischief against our mother tongue and heritage.

If, according to you, “99.999999…% of our people has approved” this mischief, it is necessary for history to take that so many people have been reduced to such pusillanimous condition within a decade of demoralizing misrule, that they – recognized from the times of the Epics to the British time as the bravest people in India – have lost their courage to go against the whimsical and capricious decisions of the Government.

But had the spelling change been ever subjected to plebiscite? Where from you got the statistics that 99.999999…% of our people have approved the spelling change “even before the Bill was passed”? Be honest. Be honest in contributing to living history, if you can.

In all my articles on this subject in these pages I have shown the distinction of D that forms the crux of this issue. For ready reference, I am placing this picture –

D in 2 different forms
Mark the two shapes of the single Oriya alphabet.

The archaic magnificence of Oriya language lies in this alphabet. When the letter is used in the first position of a word the first shape is used as in DARA.

D in the beginning of a wordD in the middleWhen the letter is used after the first alphabet in a word, its second shape with the dot underneath is used as in MADAKA.

D in 2 different use
To understand the distinction, mark the word DABADABA. Here the word has 2 uses of D. There is no dot under D, which is used at the beginning of the word. But there is a dot under D which is used as the third letter in the word.

The uniqueness of Oriya language lies in this. The single alphabet D appears in two forms: D in the first position of a word and D with dot underneath in subsequent positions. Therefore, the alphabet in second position has a dot underneath as in the name of our motherland and in the name of our mother tongue.D with dot underneath in our state namedot underneath as in the name of our mother tongue

This deference in situational shape of the single alphabet D, had given birth to use of R in place of D in the second or any later position in a word, as our founding fathers had preferred to show the world our distinction.

The change that the Kera-Oriya Naveen Patnaik has brought out in English spelling of the name of our motherland and mother tongue is against the archaic magnificence and classical distinction of our language over and above being an offense against our founding fathers.

The concerned law is a bad law and needs rejection with utmost contempt by everybody to whom Oriya’s linguistic beauty and archaic magnificence are matters of pride.
Kind Regards,
Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Orissa shall not become Odisha

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

I appreciate the deep love for the motherland that I mark in some of my friends when they appeal me to adopt Odisha in place of Orissa, specifically as the constitution has been amended to this effect and accordingly to change the name of orissamatters.com to odishamatters.com. Sri Pramod Chandra Pattanaik, my nephew, a highly patriotic intellectual and a retired IAS officer, whom I love and rely upon, represents this class of friends. I therefore, think it proper to post my views again in the matter.

A margin note in our Home page declares as to why shall we not adopt ‘Odisha’ in place of Orissa. There is a link therein that finally spells out as to why we will not change the English spelling of the name of our motherland and mother tongue despite the constitutional amendment. If any law asks a child to change the spelling of the name of his/her mother, it is proper to ignore that law; we maintain.

When Orissa’s Kera Oriya Chief Minister initiated this mischief, I had appealed him and his ministers not to adopt the proposal in the Cabinet as it would go against archaic uniqueness of Oriya language and damage its classical character. Stage by stage, in every stage, ORISSA MATTERS had argued as to why the proposed change was unnecessary, unwanted, uncalled for and injurious to uniqueness of Oriya language.

In the final stage, when the Parliament was to finally take up the issue, we, as a sentinel of Orissa, had also elaborated as to why this proposal should be rejected. But as the stupid politicians have no real concern for the motherland, the Constitution got amended. As my reaction thereto has been linked to the margin note on our Main page, I think, our views before its adoption, may help my friends getting the crux of the issue.

In answering as to why Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik, whose aversion to Oriya is so deep that despite being in power for so many years he has not learned the language, is so very adamant to change the spelling of its name, I had, on June 11, 2008, written,

“Perhaps, after pushing Orissa into the labyrinth of chaos, he is in very much want of ways to hoodwink the people. So, he wants to create a confusing aura of Oriya nationalism in the guise of spelling of the name of the State and to use it as a camouflage to get people off their guard during elections that are not far away.

But why some others, specifically amongst e-mailers, are raising the chorus for change of Orissa into Odisha?

Perhaps, they may change on perusal of this posting or on further research at their respective levels. But if one is unable to understand the intricacies of Oriya language, it would be better for him or she to appreciate that motherland Orissa has many names like Odra, Udra, Uddiyana, Oddiyana, Utkal, Kalinga, Kosala, Tosala, Orissa, Udisa, Udishya etc. Call in any of these names, only she will thereby be addressed. There is no necessity to change or drop any of them.

Lord Vishu has a thousand names. So also Devi Durga. So also many of major Deities. So also mother Earth. If we have the liberty to call any of them in any of their names, we should have no problem in retaining every name of our motherland including Orissa.

What is that to us if Bombay became Mumbai or Calcutta became Kolkata or Madras became Chennai? Why should we belittle ourselves to be affected by that? Our motherland has many names with glowing history of heritage behind all of them. We have a place of pride under the Sun as an ancient nation of matchless creative people who are second to none in uprightness and valour.

If we have any reason to feel dejected and want to be extricated from that, we are not to imitate name changers of Bombay or Calcutta or Madras; we are to reject the name changers of Orissa, who have contrived this mischief to divert public attention from the damage they have done to this splendid soil”.

The entire article may be perused here.

Read with the article linked to the margin note in the home page of ORISSA MATTERS, this article, I believe, may make the background of why we continue to write Orissa and Oriya instead of Odisha and Odia clear to my friends.

I repeat, if any law is created to force a child to change the spelling of the name of his/her mother, that law deserves to be disobeyed with utmost contempt.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 232 other followers