OrissaMatters

News. Views.

RADHA WAS CREATED BY SRI JAYA DEV OF ORISSA FOR SAHAJAYANA

October 11th, 2002

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Radha has developed into a major model in the eyes of Krshna worshipers. But, originally, she was conceived by Sri Jaya Dev in consonance with the now extinct Mohodadhi Civilization of Orissa. The immortal love-lyricist of Orissa had willfully created her to propagate the female-centric philosophy of Vajrayan.

Antagonists of Buddhism having failed to undo the Buddhist impact of the Sahajia lyrics of Sri Jaya Dev, have usurped Radha for Hindu religion, projecting her as the beloved concert of Krushna of Dwaraka and to make their story look authentic, have projected her as the daughter of Brushabhanu and the wife of Chandrasena. But Sri Jaya Dev, creator of Radha, had never created Chandrasena or Brusabhanu.

Radha, as daughter of Brushabhanu or wife of Chandrasena was nothing but a product of the tactics of interpolation adopted for burying down her role as a Sahaja Nayika of the Sahajayana (Kama Vajrayana) school of Buddhism. At a much later time, works of poets contemporary or junior to Jayadev were interpolated with verse or verses to show Radha as consort of Krshna in a manner that would best serve the design of Hinduism and in order to establish this, interpolations were made on various works to show that Radha-Krshna cult was created centuries before Sri Jayadev. The entire exercise was meant to usurp Radha for Hindu chauvinism by diverting attention from her role in Sahajiya Buddhism.

That this was a deliberate development is proved by the very fact that there is no mention of Radha in connection to Krshna in Mahabharat despite rampant interpolations up to 18th century.

No mention of her is found in Bhagavat Mahapurana.

No mention of her is found even in Puranas written in the Chaitanya era.

As for example, the famous Bhagavata authored in Oriya by Jagannatha Dasa is totally silent on Radha even though by his time, Jayadevs love lyrics depicting Radha as the beloved of Krshna was most popular in Orissa; and not only that, Chaitanya had also adopted the Radha cult. Absolutely oblivious of Radha, Jagannath Dasa has narrated the love of the Gopies.

Radha was not even recognized by avowed worshipers of Krshna till many centuries after Jayadev. A reading of the a very famous hymn addressed to Srikrshna as GOPASTRIPARIBESTITA meaning embraced collectively by the women of the Cowherd caste proves this as in this hymn the author has not mentioned Radha for once.

There is no mention of Radha in any literature, in Krshna context, at least up to this. Therefore, till 18th century we do not find any Radhakrshna temple. We find only Gopinath temples.

It is note worthy that, Oriya Vaisnav saints were so much averse to Radha that they had opposed Goudiya Vaisnavas as they were singing glory to her under the influence of Chaitanya, whom Ray Ramananda Pattanayak had initiated into Radha cult; the cult created and developed by Sri Jaya Dev with the sole purpose of propagating the tenets of Sahajiya Buddhism.

Prior to Chaitanyas arrival, Gajapati Purusottama Dev (son of Gajapati Kapilendra Dev) had prohibited recitation of Jaya Devs love lyrics in Sri Mandira and had, in its place, promulgated a work, purported to have been authored by himself, under the caption Abhinav Gita Govinda.

As people revolted, he had to withdraw his own work in favor of Jaya Devs; but with a tactful approval of interpolation in form of many stanzas. The mass unrest over this issue was constant till Prataprudra Dev made it mandatory that only the songs of Jaya Dev, and nothing else, can be sung in Sri Mandira.

But in the process, the then State Power could succeed in usurping Radha for Hinduism. And with this, many stories were concocted to show that she was the daughter of Brusabhanu, wife of Chandrasena etc so that general public could be diverted from her Sahajiya status to Hindu Vaisnavite role.

This is proved by the fact that there is no mention of Radha as Krshnas consort in any of religious or religio-historical texts before Purusottam Devs aborted attempt to marshal a Radha of his own design in the above said Abhinav Gita Govinda.

Taking advantage of Orissas disadvantage under the Britishraj, the Begalis have made all out attempt to usurp Orissas Jaya Dev for their land and even have dared to say that Radha was creation of Bengal! As for example, Dr. Bagchi says in History of Bengal, Vol.1, p.404, Radha was probably a Bengali innovation made shortly before the time of Jayadev and represented only a Vaishnavite phase of growing Shaktism.

This dare devil cultural dishonesty was threadbare exposed when History admitted that before Chaitanya came to know of Sri Jaya Devs love lyrics at Puri, and adopted Jayadevs Radha cult as the base of his preaching, there was no trace of Radha in Bengal. The historian in Rakhal Das Banerjee came out to declare that The popularity of Radha Krshna cult in the North-Eastern provinces of India appears to date from the advent of the great reformer Chaitanya.(Eastern Indian school of Mediaval Sclupture, Chapter VI, p.127)

And, Chaitanya came to know of Radha only from Orissas great son Raya Ramananda Pattanayak. It has been clearly admitted by Chaitanya who has said that he has learnt everything that he was preaching from Raya Ramananda.

Chaitanya had not kept it secret. It was known to all his followers.

Kavi Karnapuras famous Chaitanya Chandrodaya Natakam carries this truth in specific dialogues, where Chaitanya asks, Who should be worshiped? (KIMUPAASYAMATRA?) and Raya Ramananda Pattanayak says, Only Srikrshna with Radha. (MAHASISRIKRSHNARADHABHIDHE) (Act-VII)

So, it is Raya Ramananda Pattanayak who initiated Chaitanya in the cult of Radha and it is Chaitanya from whom the people of Bengal could come to know of Radha. It is therefore a shame that Bengalis like Dr.Bagchi (quoted supra) claim that Radha was probably a Bengali innovation!

However, Bengal and for that matter none of the rest of India, had any contribution to projection of Radha as the consort of Krshna. This is proved from the fact that Radha was unknown to Vrindavan, the citadel of Krshna cult till even the eighteenth century A.D.

I quote from “Bhakti Ratnakara” authored by the famous Vaisnav poet Narahari Chakravarty. He has mentioned that when the image of Govinda was established at
Vrindavan, there was no image of Radha.

Where from, then, Radha came to Vrindavan? She came only from Orissa.

It is only the King of Orissa who installed Radha at Vrindavana. Admitting this in Indian Culture’, (Vol.V, No.2), historian Amar Nath Roy says,

The deities installed by the Goswamis at Vrindavana were single images of Krshna; that long after their times a Chief of Orissa sent to Vrindavana the first Srimati (Image of Radha) which was installed by the side of one of the deities and the omission in case of others was made good gradually.

From this it is clear that Radha was created in Orissa and popularized through the Radha cult conceived and carried ahead by Sri Jaya Dev of Orissa.

Feel free to share Orissa Matters articles!:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
Posted by Subhas C Pattanayak Filed in art & culture, history, myspace

One Response to “RADHA WAS CREATED BY SRI JAYA DEV OF ORISSA FOR SAHAJAYANA”

  1. OrissaMatters » Blog Archive » MAHODADHI MUST REPLACE BAY OF BENGAL IN ORISSA REGION Says:
    April 29th, 2008 at 6:38 pm

    [...] for themselves a fabricated cultural heritage. Their false claims over Sri Jaya Dev, creator of Radha and author of Sahajiya love lyrics squeezed into the Geet Govind as well as on Chaurashi [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Subhas Chandra Pattanayak Representative-in-Chief

    Saswat Pattanayak
    Content Editor


  • Syndicate

    • RSS Feed
    • Subscribe to Bloglines
    • Subscribe to MyYahoo!
    • Subscribe to Google Reader
    • Subscribe to MyMSN
    • Subscribe to MyAOL
    • Subscribe to Rojo
    • Subscribe to FeedLounge
    • Subscribe to Newsgator
    • Subscribe to Netvibes
    • Help with feeds
  • Recent Posts

    • DISMANTLE INDIRA GANDHI PARK TO RESTORE THE DEMOCRACY POINT
    • HIGHEST JUDICIARY SHOULDN’T SHY AT PEOPLES’ RIGHT TO INFORMATION
    • CAPITALISTS IN QUAGMIRE: GANDHIJI’S THEORY OF TRUSTEESHIP MAY GIVE A TEMPORARY REPRIEVE
    • DON’T MAKE MOCKERY OF MAY DAY; GUESS, IF YOU CAN, WHAT MAY HAPPEN ONE DAY
    • ORISSA UNDER THE CLIMATE OF CRIME
    • AJIT ADDS STRENGTH TO DISCOVERY OF TRUTH ON BUDDHA’S BIRTHPLACE
    • MAHODADHI MUST REPLACE BAY OF BENGAL IN ORISSA REGION
    • IT PORTENDS JUDICIAL ANARCHY
    • NEED INTEREST-FREE FINANCE? SATISFY A BJP MINISTER, LOOT AN OFFICIAL INSTITUTE
    • HOW DO YOU RATE THIS GOVERNMENT?
  • Archives

    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • September 2004
    • July 2004
    • April 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • August 2002
    • July 2002
    • June 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    • March 2002
    • February 2002
    • January 2002
    • December 2001
    • November 2001
  • Activism/Freelance

    • Media Bistro
    • Media Bloggers
    • Poynter Online
    • Reporters Sans Frontiers
    • Society of Professional Journalists
    • The Independent Journalist
  • Alternative Media

    • Amrita Thinks…
    • IISER Blog
    • Saswat.com
    • Tehelka
    • Tom Paine
    • Whose Media
  • International Media

    • Economist
    • International Herald Tribune
    • New York Times
    • OrissaLinks
    • Washington Post
  • Local Media

    • Dharitri
    • Pragativadi
    • Samaja
    • Sambad
  • National Media

    • Hindustan Times
    • India Today
    • Indian Express-East/South
    • Indian Express-North/West
    • Outlook
    • The Hindu
    • The Pioneer
    • The Statesman
    • The Telegraph
    • Times of India
  • Useful Links

    • Personal Finance Window
  •  

    October 2002
    M T W T F S S
    « Sep   Nov »
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
  • RSS Unknown Feed

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Whose Media?

    • We?ve Moved
    • Apple - Thoughts on Music
    • Zero-sum game
    • Lockheed Stock and Two Smoking Barrels
    • Capital in the Capitol: The Power Politics of Money
  • Admin

    • Login
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • New Oriya Site


  • Visit my family
    Join the Dogster community
  • OrissaMatters is edited by Saswat Pattanayak All Content Copyright 2001-2006 The News Syndicate. (Regn. # 17013/1847 of 1979-80) Office: VR-32, Unit-6, Bhubaneswar 751001, Orissa, India