ORISSA CM MUST RISE TO THE OCCASION AND JOIN THE CAMPAIGN

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Orissa Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik is seen very keen in protecting the interest of POSCO; but come the question of protecting the interest of Orissa, one feels, he should know how not to be nonchalant.

Orissa has been severely hit by an order of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh who has reversed the central government decision to establish a National Institute of Sciences (NIS) at Bhubaneswar. The reversal smacks of Bengali conspiracy against Orissa. But Patnaik has failed to rise to the occasion. He must reverse his own attitude and address himself to the cause of Orissa in a way expected of a Chief Minister.

We have earlier discussed the issue in these pages. The Chief Minister must try to understand the issue and take up the matter with the Prime Minister Mr. Singh in right earnest and if Mr. Singh does not buzz, must join the mass campaign that patriots of Orissa have already started.

For him to understand the issue we may begin from December 09, 2003. On this day, the then HRD Minister of India, Dr. M. M. Joshi had told the Parliamentary Consultative Committee attached to his ministry that a decision had been taken to establish four NISs including one at Bhubaneswar �for improving the relevance and quality of teaching and research� in science, which was put on records by the U.G.C. vide http://www.ugc.ac.in/pub/jan_2004/12.htm. It makes it abundantly clear that the decision to establish a NIS at Bhubaneswar had been taken by the Union Government and the Parliament of India was made a witness to this decision through its Committee comprising members of both the Houses.

When the decision was awaiting execution, a media report informed that there is possibility of shifting of the proposed site of NIS from Bhubaneswar to Kolkata.

Chief Minister Patnaik was asked for comments. He told the Press that his Government has already located necessary land for the Institute and informed the Center accordingly and hence there is no question of its shifting. He, however, assured that he will take up the matter with the Center and do every needful for execution of its earlier decision.

What has he done in the matter is not known either to the department of higher education or to the department of science & technology. But on September 28, 2005, the Press Information Bureau vide http://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=12305 informed that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has cleared on the same day an Indian Institute of Science for Education and Research (IISER) for Kolkata and has �authorized� the Ministry of HRD to fund the Institute �so that it can become operational in 2006�.

Difference in nomenclature notwithstanding, this suggesting a sure shift of the NIS from Bhubaneswar to Kolkata, the NROs, specifically members of the �ODIA SAMAJA� group of netizens under stewardship of Prof.. Chitta Baral and Prof. Debasmita Mishra started submitting their protests online.

Orissamatters.com preceded mainstream newspapers of Orissa like the Sambad and the Samaj in questioning the prudence of the Prime Minister in withdrawal of the NIS from Bhubaneswar.

But as I proceeded to see what steps our State Government has taken in the matter, I was shocked to see that the Government has neither located nor offered any land for the purpose within these two years. As I could not get any information from the secretaries of both the above-mentioned departments, I preferred a letter by e-mail to the Chief Secretary in his official id seeking information on what step the state government had taken to facilitate establishment of the NIS. A copy thereof was sent to CMO. It is a matter of surprise and shock that none of the two top functionaries have shown the courtesy of responding to a necessary and proper query from an authorized person, who has been in journalism for last four decades, specifically when the query was made in State interest. Such recalcitrant has become our administration!

In these pages, we had discussed the issue on October 07 under the caption �Under whose spell the Prime Minister has done it?� and we have the pleasure of saying that on this Vijaya Dasami, which is the day of success of battle against evil, we have carried another article from Prof. Chitta Baral who has been spearheading the campaign seeking implementation of Union Government�s original decision for establishment of a NIS/IISER at Bhubaneswar.

We strongly recommend Prof. Baral�s article captioned �Why an NIS/IISER/IIT should be established in Bhubaneswar?� to the Chief Minister. He should equip himself with all the facts and personally meet the Prime Minister for the specific purpose of placing Orissa�s case for NIS/IISER. The Prime Minister of India cannot act and cannot be allowed to act arbitrarily. The previous Government had taken the decision to establish a NIS in Bhubaneswar and had involved the Parliament with this decision by placing it before the consulting Committee. Therefore the Prime Minister cannot render that decision inconsequential. Patnaik must go and tell him of this. If Mr. Singh refuses to heed to Orissa�s just demand, Patnaik must rise to the occasion and place the matter before all the chief ministers of the Country. One province cannot be allowed to hijack the project originally meant for another province and the Chief Ministers of the country must be made aware of its adverse impact on regional balance and national integration.

Why an NIS/IISER/IIT should be established in Bhubaneswar?

Why an NIS/IISER/IIT should be established
in Bhubaneswar?

Chitta Baral, Arizona State University
—————————————————————

India is economically shining as a whole. But it is falling behind
in science and technology, especially in research. According to [1],
the best Indian university, IISc Bangalore is grouped at 300-400
internationally. The next best, IIT Kharagpur is grouped 400-500
internationally. Within Asia they are grouped 37-65 and 66-93
respectively. For a long time India had 5 IITs and one IISc. Since
then even though one new IIT has been established at Guwahati and
University of Roorkee has been made to an IIT, with large population
increase and with India falling behind in Science and Technology,
there is a need for more IIT and IISc like institutions. Moreover
with India’s economy doing well now, India can financially afford to
create several more IITs and IISc like institutions. The Indian
government, scientists and academicians all are aware of the above
and thus there are plans to create more IITs and IISc like
institutions. In this context on 9th December 2003, the then HRD
minister Professor M. M. Joshi had announced [2,3] that UGC has
established steps to initiate four National Institute of Sciences
(NIS) at Bhubaneshwar, Chennai, Pune and Allahabad. Recently [4],
Prime minister Dr. Manmohan Singh announced the setting up of two
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), which
are the same in all but name to the NIS, at Pune and Kolkata,
respectively.

Since it is a consensus that India needs more high quality
institutions like or better than the existing IITs and IISc, one of
the important questions that arises is where should these new
institutions be established. Two main principles, with some possible
tension among them, need to be followed in the determination of
locations.

1. For all around growth of India the institutions need to be
distributed across the country. (In this regard recently PM Dr.
Singh, in [5], addressed the regional imbalance issue in terms of
educational institutions and said “I trust our government as well
the state governments will take note of these findings and evolve
policies to remedy these regional imbalances.”)

2. The institutions need to be located in places where it will have
the largest impact and where it will benefit India as a whole the
most. (i.e., the biggest bang for the buck.)

Based on the marginal utility principle where the marginal
satisfaction of eating a second rosogolla is much less than eating
the first rosogolla, it is clear that biggest bang for buck of a new
IIT/NIS/IISc will be in a location or state which does not have
such an institution yet. But among these places the following
criteria becomes important:

3. The institution should be located in a place that can nurture it
locally, that has the promise to nurture it locally and that
benefits the local population also, so that the local population has
vested interest in supporting such an institution.

Finally, because of the urgency of establishing such institutions,
we need to consider the issue of:

4. Whether the location and the local and state government can help
in the quick establishment of such an institution?

We will argue here that Bhubaneswar, Orissa satisfies all the above
criteria, and if they are all taken into account it comes out in the
top among all cities in India.

(1) Currently Orissa does not have a central university [6], an
institution of national importance (such as IITs, ISI, etc.) [7], a
reputed centrally funded institute such as an IIM, or a centrally
funded IIIT or IIITM. It also does not have an autonomous science
and technology institution [8] of the department of science and
technology.

(2 and 3) We will address the issues 2 and 3 through two points. (a)
Orissa government and the people of Orissa have helped create
several top notch institutions in Bhubaneswar, Orissa which do world
class research; and (b) An IIT/IISc/NIS in Bhubaneswar will
tremendously benefit the local population, thus they will have a
vested interest in nurturing it.

(a) Orissa government and the people of Orissa have helped create
several top notch institutions in Bhubaneswar, Orissa. Notable among
them are the Institute of Physics, the Xaviers Institute of
Management and the Institute of Life Sciences, all in Bhubaneswar.
We now describe these institutes using phrases from their web pages.

The Institute Of Physics, Bhubaneswar is an autonomous research
institution funded jointly by the Department Of Atomic Energy (DAE)
and the Government of Orissa. The Institute was officially
established in 1972 by the Government of Orissa [9]. Research at
Institute of Physics is top notch by international standards. Its
alumni [10] have gone on to many good institutions all over the
world. Many of its faculty and students have preferred it over an
IIT. Its annual report [11], publication list [12], faculty vita,
and alumni biography [10] are testament to the quality of this
institution in Bhubaneswar.

The Xaviers Institute of Management [13] owes its origin to a Social
Contract between the Government of Orissa and the OJS (Orissa Jesuit
Society). It was established in 1987, and ranks among the top
business schools in India [14]. This year’s Outlook magazine ranks
it 8 in the country among various business schools, including the
IIMs. It has faculty with Ph.Ds from top business schools such as
University of Massachusetts, and Stern School of Business, NYU, New
York.

The Institute of Life Sciences, an initiative by the Govt. of
Orissa, Department of Science and Technology started a decade back.
On August 2, 2002 it came under the administrative and financial
control of Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. It was
dedicated to the nation on July 15, 2003 by the Prime Minister of
India with a declaration to develop it as “National Centre of
Excellence” engaged in research on various areas of modern biology.
The researchers of this institute publish often in international
journals [15].

To reiterate, the above three institutions were created by the
foresightedness of the Government of Orissa, and are now premier
research institutions, albeit small with limited focus, but doing
world class research and teaching. Besides these three there are
several other research institutions in and around Bhubaneswar that
do very good and useful research. This includes the Regional
Research laboratory (RRL) [17] in Bhubaneswar, the Regional medical
research center (RMRC) [18] (see page 123 – 125) in Bhubaneswar, the
Central Rice research institute (CRRI) [19] in Cuttack , the central
institute of fresh water aquaculture (CIFA) [20,21] in Bhubaneswar,
and the national institute of rehabilitation training and research
[22] in Olatpur. In additions two fledgling institutions, the
Institute of Material sciences [23] and the Institute of mathematics
and application [24] have been established by the Government of
Orissa and are in their beginning stages.

The above illustrates, how Bhubaneswar and Orissa have established
and nurtured top notch research and educational institutions. Thus
one can extrapolate and conclude that with high probability an
NIS/IISER/IIT in Bhubaneswar will be very successful and well
nurtured. Nevertheless, as we mentioned earlier, it is important
that an institution like NIS/IISER/IIT should have some significant
benefit to the local population, lest the local population feel
alienated by it.

(b) In the greater Bhubaneswar area (which includes Puri and
Cuttack) there are now 2 state funded and 19 private engineering
colleges. An NIS/IISER/IIT in Bhubaneswar will benefit these
institutions as a place where the faculty of the local colleges can
pursue higher education (without moving away and thus negatively
affecting their parent institutions), the local colleges can recruit
high quality faculty from among the NIS/IISER/IIT graduates, and the
students of the local colleges can pursue summer research and
training at the NIS/IISER/IIT. Besides Bhubaneswar and its vicinity
have a large range of industries with many more industries set to
come. This includes metal based industries such as NALCO to software
companies such as Infosys and Satyam, and planned operations of TCS,
and Wipro. There will be significant synergy between these
industries and the proposed NIS/IISER/IIT in terms of joint
research, students of NIS/IISER/IIT pursuing practical training at
the industries, and employees of the industries pursuing higher
degree at the NIS/IISER/IIT. In addition Orissa has two STPs (at
Bhubaneswar, Rourkela), and one more STP in Berhampur in the making,
which will provide opportunities to the graduates of the
NIS/IISER/IIT to incubate start-up companies. Thus, with great
benefit potential of an NIS/IISER/IIT to the local population and
the benefit to the NIS/IISER/IIT from existing infrastructure,
Bhubaneswar is an ideal place for establishing an NIS/IISER/IIT.

Now moving on to the final point, because of the urgency an
NIS/IISER/IIT can be immediately started in Bhubaneswar by using
some of its existing infrastructure.

(3) In particular, the Institute of Physics and the Institute of
Life Sciences can be the starting point of an NIS/IISER/IIT. The
picturesque Institute of Physics campus can be used to start an
NIS/IISER/IIT right away. As mentioned earlier, Bhubaneswar also has
the beginning of an Institute of Material Science, and an Institute
of Mathematics and Applications, which may be folded into an
NIS/IISER/IIT. If an NIS/IISER/IIT is started in Bhubaneswar, the
Institute of Physics and Institute of Life Sciences faculty can form
the initial core faculty and teach the first classes until the
institute hires additional faculty. The researchers at Regional
medical research center, and Regional research laboratory can also
chip in.

Conclusion: In summary, Bhubaneswar is the best in the country with
respect to the various criteria necessary for the next location of
an NIS/IISER/IIT. It is clear that for that reason, in December
2003, the then HRD minister Professor M. M. Joshi had announced
[2,3] that UGC has established steps to initiate one of the four
National Institute of Sciences at Bhubaneswar. Unfortunately, for
some reason the recent announcements for IISER did not include
Bhubaneswar. Although this injustice needs to be corrected for many
other reasons, by its own merit, as we elaborated in this article,
Bhubaneswar, Orissa deserves an NIS/IISER/IIT immediately and we
sincerely hope the central government will agree with us and pursue
this at the earliest.

———————————————————————

[1] http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm

[2]. http://www.ugc.ac.in/pub/jan_2004/12.htm

[3].
http://pib.nic.in/archieve/lreleng/lyr2003/rdec2003/10122003/r1012200
313.html

[4]. http://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=12305

[5]. http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/28pm1.htm

[6]. List of central Universities
http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/utype.php?st=Central%20University,
http://www.education.nic.in/htmlweb/autbod.htm (NONE in Orissa)

[7]. List of Institute of National Importance from
http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/utype.php?st=Institute%20of%20National%
20Importance
(NONE in Orissa)

[8]. List of autonomous Science and Technology Institutions from
http://dst.gov.in/autonomous/autonomous_index.htm (NONE in Orissa)

[9] http://www.iopb.res.in/overview.php

[10] http://www.iopb.res.in/~alumni/members/members.html

[11] http://www.iopb.res.in/~library/ar_02_03/

[12] http://www.iopb.res.in/~library/ar_02_03/Publications.pdf

[13] http://www.ximb.ac.in/about/

[14]http://www.orissalinks.com/#ximb

[15] http://www.ilsc.org/

[16] http://www.ilsc.org/publication.htm

[17] http://www.rrlbhu.res.in/publication.html

[18] http://www.icmr.nic.in/000517/ann2002.pdf

[19] http://crri.nic.in/accomplishments.htm

[20] http://www.stpbh.soft.net/cifa/list_of_extfundedproject.doc

[21] http://www.stpbh.soft.net/cifa/insti_based.doc

[22] http://nirtar.nic.in/

[23] http://orissagov.nic.in/sciencetechnology/ims.htm

[24] http://orissagov.nic.in/sciencetechnology/ima.htm

SOCIAL SLAVERY GETS OFFICIAL SUPPORT: PROTESTOR IMPRISONED

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

baghambarMr Baghambar Pattanayak, the suave social activist of Puri is in Jharapada Special Jail at Bhubaneswar since 04October 05.

He is jailed not for any economic or criminal offence; but because he headed a protest rally against social slavery in the Capital City of the State. The rally was not an impromptu occurrence. Government had been duly notified of it and in appropriate manner. Instead of heeding to a just and humanitarian cause, police was used to demoralize the protestors by engineering imprisonment of their leader. Pattanayak is happy that he has dared the jail in the cause of social justice. But by sending him to Jail the State Administration is caught in flagrante delicto in supporting a social evil like slavery.

Visitors of this portal are acquainted with Sri Pattanayak’s campaign against upper caste oppression let loose on members of the barber caste in specifically the district of Puri. Government is well aware of the fact that 82 families of barbers in 17 villages of Puri district are being socially and economically boycotted by the upper castes after their refusal to continue the age old practice of washing feet and cleaning up the ort in public functions and other inhuman and degrading traditions. Our report dated 24 August 05 would remind you of how convincingly the human rights activists under leadership of Sri Pattanayak had put forth the grievances of the disadvantaged barbers vis-a-vis the constitutional framework for eradication of bonded labor in this particular sector.

The District administration having no inclination to heed to it, upper caste hoodlums who are bent upon to perpetuate this slavery could contrive a new method of torture designed to frighten up the agitators to such an extent that they would think a thousand times before raising their voice against the oppression in future.

They jumped on their women folk and denuded four of them; assaulted and paraded them in that wretched condition under the scorching sun to the dastardly amusement of the perpetrators of caste superiority in the village of Bhubanpati under Brahmagiri Police Station of Puri on 19 September 2005. Profusely covered by media, this heinous assault on human rights rocked the entire State, but the State Government remained recalcitrant.

Perpetrators of this crime have so much confidence in the collaboration of the State, that they have got united under the banner of Kshyatriya Khandayat Mahasabha and resolved to thwart any attempt that they would find inconvenient to their social tradition of using barbers for feet-washing and ort cleaning. It is a shame that the Government has not yet thought it prudent to take these asserters to task even though their resolution is designed to precipitate social violence.

In such a State, under such an administration, what else could have happened to Sri Pattanayak than incarceration for championing the cause of the oppressed?

A NASTY TRICK PLAYED IN THE GUISE OF ODISSI DANCE RESEARCH

A NASTY TRICK PLAYED IN THE GUISE OF ODISSI DANCE RESEARCH

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Behind back of the Oriya nation, danseuse Kum Kum Mohanty has played a nasty trick. She has reduced Orissa to a state of ungratefulness.

Using Government of Orissa, she has published a book styled as ‘The Odissi Dance Path Finder Vol-1’ in the capacity of Chief Executive of Odissi Research Centre, which is purchasable only against US Dollar. Naturally therefore people of Orissa are not aware of this book. She has given a misleading history of Odissi dance in its foreword and given an account of how it earned classical status. Even though designed to show as official record, she has, in this book, deliberately omitted the name of Kavichandra Kalicharan Pattanayak, the man who had defeated all obstacles to fetch classical status for Odissi dance. The book being meant for foreigners and non-resident Indians, not priced as it is in Rupee, whosoever in the world outside Orissa gets interested in Odissi dance, shall never know the matchless contributions of Sri Pattanayak to revival of this unique dance form of Orissa and to its recognition as a classical dance.

Truth must prevail and therefore in spite of Ms. Mohanty’s mischief, the truth-seekers will one day know how under the spell of a danseuse history is set to obliterate a man to whom the Oriya nation should have remained grateful forever.
.
Odissi teachers are in a position to rectify this wrong. But most of them are not aware of this. When the book published by the Odissi Research Centre, created and projected as Government of Orissa’s official wing on Odissi does not mention his name even for once, what to speak of the common practitioners?

But it is Sri Pattanayak who revived Odissi as Orissa’s national dance and persuaded India to accept it as a classical one. And, for this he had to defeat many a design that was determined to deny it classical status.

It is sad that his name is not mentioned in the document, which is published by Ms. Mohanty in the name of Government of Orissa.

Almost everybody who had helped Sri Pattanayak in establishing Odissi as a classical dance is omitted.

Ms. Mohanty has not thought it prudent to mention the name of even Ms. Jayanti Nandi who was the first demonstrator of Odissi in the national headquarters before the national jury in attunement with the theory placed by Sri Pattanayak in the national dance seminar without which classicality of the dance form could not have bagged national recognition as it did.

Kum Kum has reduced Orissa to a stage of ungratefulness by omitting the role not only Sri Pattanayak and Ms.Nandi, but also of Dr. Nrusingha Charan Samantaray, Chintamani Panigrahi, Pratap Keshari Deo, Umacharan Pattanayak and Shraddhakara Supakar who as Members of Parliament had used all their might in convincing government of India to accord classical status to Odissi on the basis of the theoretical presentation with matching practical demonstration that Sri Pattanayak had given in the National Dance Seminar where the Jury in consonance with express opinion of the great gathering of experts and critics had announced unreserved recognition of its classicality.

Forgotten is Indrani Rehman, whose demonstrative performance in consonance with Sri Pattanayak’s theory in the Talkotra Stadium of Delhi, had prompted the concerned Union Minister Hyumayun Kabir to express national gratitude to Sri Pattanayak for his singular role in adding Odissi to the list of classical dances of India.

Forgotten is the collaboration of Charles Febri and Mohan Khokar with Sri Pattanayak that had facilitated his overcoming the hurdles created by saboteurs on the eve of the National Seminar to place before the connoisseurs his theory with practical demonstration on 5th April 58 in the Vigyan Bhawan auditorium of Delhi.

Forgotten are Barrister Raghumani Pattanayak, Sarala Kosambi and Vinod Chopra but for whose cooperation with Sri Pattanayak, Odissi Dance would have missed forever the chance to earn the classical status. I say “missed forever” because none other than Sri Pattanayak could have bagged the classical staus for Odissi. We will see it later.

At the moment this much can be said that the scriptural codes on the basis of which Sri Pattanayak had established the classicality of Odissi are forgotten too.

Forgotten are also the methods of subterfuge adopted by Kelucharan Mohapatra, Debprasad Das, Govind Tej etc.

Forgotten is the trick played by Ramanand Kanungo, son of the then union minister Nityananda Kanungo, who himself was hand-in-glove with conspirators to sabotage Sri Pattanayak’s endeavors for recognition of classicality of Odissi.

Some members of this later group are still alive. They know that Sri Pattanayak had initiated the demand for national recognition of classicality of both Odissi Dance and Odissi Music. And had done everything to achieve this.

His paper on Odissi dance being placed as the base paper before the National Seminar at New Delhi on 5 April 1958, defeating every conspiracy hinted to above, he had convinced the Country that Odissi is a true instance of classicism and the entire galaxy of exponents of classical dances and dance critics present in the Bigyan Bhawan auditorium were, on the basis of the theoretical and practical presentation of the unique tenets of Odissi by him, one in their opinion, that if any dance is classical, Odissi is.

But this was not an easy achievement for Sri Pattanayak. His denigrators suffering obviously from inferiority complex, hand-in-glove with people envious of Orissa’s cultural superiority, were bent upon obstructing Odissi’s recognition as a classical dance lest the credit goes to Sri Pattanayak.

The most astounding obstacle was also conspiratorially spreading from the corridors of Nityananda Kanungo, then a central minister who was representing Nehru’s Cabinet in the Central Sangit Natak Academy. Sri Pattanayak had to overcome that obtacle.

Let us have a cursory view of that.

Secretary of Central Sangit Natak Academy (hereinafter called the Academy) Smt. Nirmala Joshi had informed Sri Pattanayak on 4 Jan.1958 that his pleadings for recognition of Odissi as a classical dance being in vogue since 1954, may be considered in the National Dance Seminar to be held at Delhi from March 31 to April 6, 1958. He should present his paper specifically for the Jury written within 1000 words and bring a group of “most competent” dancers to give supportive demonstration. “It is suggested that the group should be as small as possible”, she had said.

Sri Pattanayak had written the first book on Odissi dance in 1954 in English with the title ‘Odissi Dance’. He modified its properties to 1000 words in accordance with the Academy stipulations and sent the advance copy recaptioning the same as “Odissi Dance Tradition”.

At this stage, as is discernible, the mischief mongers ignited their activities. On 13th Feb.1958, he was pressurized by the Academy through P.C.Jain to get in touch with Govind Tej of the National Music Association (hereinafter called the Association) in order to be able to give his demonstration.

It was a mischief of most incomprehensible dastardliness. Central Minister Nitanand Kanungo’s son Ramanand was associated with this Association and obviously, under pressure of the Minister, this mischief was contrived.

However, without any hesitation, in the best of spirit of a true patriot, Sri Pattanayak contacted this Association and requested it to draft one or more artists to him for training as to how to give demonstration of what he should be saying. The association did not heed to his request.

The said P.C.Jain wrote to Sri Pattanayak again on 17 March 1958 that his paper has been approved and is scheduled to be placed before the dance seminar on 4 April 1958. Agenda thus fixed, Sri Pattanayak again requested the Association to cooperate in demonstration. But till the last moment, it did not buzz.

It was clear that the Association was determined to sabotage the cause of Odissi and was playing this trick to debar Sri Pattanayak from presenting his pleadings. Left with no other option, Sri Pattanayak picked up Ms. Jayanti Nandi, who was at that time a student of Kala Vikash Kendra, Cuttack and made her attuned to his paper and took her to Delhi to attend the scheduled agenda.

When he was inspecting the auditorium on 4 April 1958 to finalize as to how to offer the practical demonstration while placing his paper, the Secretary of the Academy Ms. Nirmala Joshi informed him that the agenda for the Seminar has changed and he cannot present his paper.

Was it a conspiracy? Yes it was.

When the Association trick could not click, the saboteurs tried to stop Sri Pattanayak delivering his address and demonstration. It was clear.

Shocked to the core, a combine of Oriya and non-Bengali M.P.s namely Shradhakar Supakar, P.K.Deo, and Umacharan Pattanayak of Orissa, Badua, Basumatari and Bhagawati of Assam, Dr.Malkhote and Laxmi Bai of Andhra including eminent scholars in the field namely Dr. Charles Fabri and Indrani Rehman met the President-in-charge of the Academy Ms. Kamaladevi Chattopadhyaya and requested her not to cancel the agenda for presentation of Sri Pattanayak’s paper on Odissi dance. She refused the request. The conspiracy was clear.

Then the combine met the concerned minister Dr.Humayun Kabir in the Parliament Lobby and convinced him of the conspiracy.

On his intervention, Sri Pattanayak was allowed to present his paper. But again he was saddled with term that stipulated that he shall have to conclude his presentation within half an hour without any demonstration.

Sri Pattanayak was disheartened but did not lost hope. As he proceeded, the splendid congregation of dance connoisseurs, by that time well aware of the conspiracy against Orissa’s cultural interest, demanded in the hall itself that Sri Pattanayak should be allowed to give demonstration in support of the theory he was propounding, which was tactfully but meticulously executed by the Master using Ms. Nandi whom he had brought with him, in a hope against hope, in costumes. The house was so very surcharged with the proof of classicism in Odissi and so very irritated over the conspiracy against it that the Jury did not allow the Association-Academy trick to work. On vociferous demand of the audience, Sri Pattanayak went on putting forth his argument with corresponding demonstrations unhindered for 3 hours and 35 minutes at the end of which the Jury unanimously declared that there cannot be any doubt on the classicality of Odissi dance.

It was a day of victory for Sri Pattanayak as well as for Odissi. Delhi was agog with the rise of this new source of classicality in India’s horizon of culture.

It was decided, then and there, that every interested person in the National Capital should watch the unique dance of Orissa the next day, i.e. the 6th April 1958.

Sri Pattanayak instantly prevailed upon beauty queen Indrani Rehman to cooperate with him in presenting the dance to which she agreed. Sri Pattanayak had earlier taught Ms. Rehman a few numbers on Jayadev’s love lyrics as depicted in Gita Govinda.. A totally dedicated Oriya nationalist as he was, Sri Pattanayak found in the audience demand a golden opportunity to present Sri Jayadev as the poet of Orissa at Delhi where people from all parts of India were sure to gather. And, he did it.

On the 6th April 1958, Ms. Rehman offered oblations to Sri Pattanayak as the Guru and as chosen by him gave an ever memorable performance of Odissi depicting the lyrics of ‘Orissa’s Jayadev to the unprecedented approval of the august audience. Dr. Hyumayun Kabir, in the capacity of the portfolio holder Union Minister, personally ushered in Sri Pattanayak to the podium and felicitated him with thanks for the new addition he made to the classical dances of India. Thus, because of Sri Pattanayak Odissi Dance earned the classical status on this day i.e. the 6th day of April 1958 finally.

But this was intolerable to the cultural Kalapahads. The anti-Oriya lobby strengthened by central minister Nityananda Kanungo’s antagonistic attitude towards Sri Pattanayak tried to obliterate the national recognition of the classicality of Odissi Dance at a later stage.

On 18 April 1958, Academy Secretary Nirmala Joshi issued a note noting therein that Odissi was not recognized as a classic dance as the observation of the National Seminar Jury was not binding on it. She informed that the Academy was appointing an experts committee on whose finding recognition of its classicality would depend.

The Statesman, reacting to this press note, on 20 April 1958 posed the question: “Odissi being as beautiful and as classical as it is, what recognition from the Academy is needed at all?”

And, in fact, the Nation of India in particular and the entire world in general did not need the Academy recognition in support of classical status of Odissi. The national felicitation offered to Sri Pattanayak at the Talkotra Stadium in the National Capital on 6th April 1958 itself had put the national stamp of approval on the classical status of Odissi dance.

Kelucharan Mohapatra and Deba Prasad Das, even though trained and promoted by this great master, had refused to help him in his campaign for recognition of Odissi as a classical dance. But they later derived unlimited benefit from his success.

History should be addressed to say, “Had there been no Kalicharan Pattanayak, Odissi Dance would never have been recognized as a classical dance till date”. A cursory view on the status of Odissi music would be enough to arrive at this conclusion.

Till his last days he was trying to fetch classical status for Odissi Music too. In his autobiography he has written how Nilamadhav Panigrahi, Anant Mishra, Satyanarayan Rajguru etc had been opposing him in his endeavor to achieve recognition of Odissi as a classical music. After he passed away, all the proofs he had gathered in favour of his argument are left at the mercy of elements in the State Museum building where they were stashed uncared for by the Directorate of Culture. Notwithstanding abundant presence of Odissi musicians and sabjanata IAS officers who cherish being projected as cultural ambassadors of Orissa, none of the Odissi Gurus have succeeded in getting classical status for Odissi Music. As far back as in April, 1954, Sri Pattanayak had submitted a paper on classicality of Odissi Music which was published by Government of Orissa’s Public Relation department and circulated on the occasion of Odissi Music being rendered for the first time in Delhi, in presence of Prime Minister Pt. Nehru.

That, despite a base paper like this, and presence of so many musicians and dancers, Odissi music has not yet been able to earn classical status makes the unique position of Sri Pattanayak as the matchless exponent of Odissi classicality absolutely clear. The patriotic fervor with which he had taken up the cause of Odissi is not found in any. Therefore Odissi Music is left in the lurch.

His struggle to win the classical status for Odissi dance succeeded during his lifetime due to the support of the alert Media and Members of Parliament mentioned above as well due to determined support of dance connoisseurs whom he had inspired. He would have succeeded in bringing the same recognition for Odissi music too, had his denigrators, suffering from inferiority complex, not opposed him. He is no more alive, but no other Oriya has taken up the cause of Odissi music in as earnest zeal as was his. Therefore, the Odissi Music has failed to fetch the classical status as yet although it is its due.

Had the Odissi Dance teachers and dancers been basing their presentations only on the Odissi music as was contemplated by Sri Pattanayak, it would have been accepted as a classical music by this time. But they have never thought it prudent to pay due respect to this great Master, although they have emerged as the real beneficiaries of Sri Pattanayak’s achievement. As they have ignored him, so also have they ignored the scriptural injunctions and reduced Odissi to a commercial dance form.

Propelled by avarice, they have, on the other hand, tried to project themselves as creators/codifiers of Odissi Dance. I had shown in a high-circulated article in Orissa’s mainstream newspaper ‘Sambad’ on 30 November 1995, how Kalibabu was encouraging his introduction as the sole force behind Odissi’s revival and recognition as a classical dance.

I had shown in the said article how in the book prepared and published by Ms. Mohanty tacit attempts were made to project herself as the creator of the written code of Odissi. “Till date, there had been no accepted basic training principles in written form”, she has mentioned in the foreword of the book. To what extent this statement is motivated wrong could be ascertained from the very fact that at page CXCIX of ‘Contribution of Orissa to Sanskrit Literature’ published by Orissa Sahitya Academy in 1960 it has been clearly mentioned that Odissi Dance and Odissi Music of Orissa were being regulated by the injunctions given in ‘Abhinaya Darpana Prakasha’ authored by the Prince of Tigiria Jadunath Rai Simha. He has not only given the code in writing but also elaborated every injunction with links to appropriate Odissi songs or Chhandas. It is a shame that there is no mention of Abhinaya Darpana Prakasha or its author Jadunath Rai Simha in Kum Kum’s book ‘The Odissi Dance Path Finder’ even though it is produced with state funding and promulgated in the name of the State.

None of the Odissi Gurus makes any mention of this original grammar of Odissi, its author Jadunath Rai Simha and the architect of Odissi’s classical status Kavichandra Kalicharan Pattanayak.

Orissa Government’s reliance on Odissi Research Centre for updatation of the codes of Odissi had generated a scope for placing before the world its real history as well as the unique contributions of Jadunath Rai Simha and Kavichandra Kalicharan Pattanayak from the angle of a grateful nation. But Kum Kum has obliterated both these Masters from official records in such a style that degrades us to level of ungratefulness. Shame. Shame.

It is time to understand that performance of a dance does not perpetuate its classicism. To retain the classicality of Odissi Dance it must be made mandatory for the performers to honor the injunctions given in Abhinaya Darpana Prakash by Prince of Tigiria, Jadunath Tunga Rai Simha and along with him, oblation must be offered to Kavichandra Kalicharan Pattanayak as an unavoidable ritual recognizing him as the principal factor of rise of Odissi in the horizon of classicism.

If this is not done and the trick played by Kum Kum Mohanty is tolerated, future shall certainly address us as an ungrateful nation.

Please react, if you can.

UNDER WHOSE SPELL THE PRIME MINISTER HAS DONE IT?

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

It is sad to say that Hon’ble Prime Minister of India can act under a spell. But people of Orissa are so bruised by an order of the PM that it is difficult to believe that he could do this without a spell.

On 9th December 2003, the then HRD minister Prof. M. M. Joshi had announced that UGC had decided to establish four National Institutes of Sciences (NIS) one each at Bhubaneshwar, Chennai, Pune and Allahabad. This was documented in the Ministry of Human Resource Development – Science & Technology – press release, dated 10 December 2003.

But it is shocking for Orissa that instead of establishing the planned NIS at Bhubaneswar, the Central Government has obliterated this proposal.

Government of India’s Press Information Bureau (PIB) in a Press Release datelined 28 Sept 2005 informs that the Prime Minister has passed orders for establishment of an Indian Institute of Science for Education and Research (IISER) at Kolkata. The only other IISER is cleared for Pune.

The aim of the N I S that Prof. Joshi had announced in December 2003 is the same as the proposed IISER. Thus, NIS and IISER, though they differ in their names carry the same concept.

Thus Orissa is severely affected by the September 28 order of the PM. She does not have any central university, any institution of national importance (such as IITs, ISI, etc.), any reputed centrally funded institute such as an IIM, or any centrally funded IIIT or IIITM. It also does not have an autonomous science and technology / institution of the department of science and technology. The PM’s order for an IISER at Kolkata has jeopardized her chance of having one such Institute even in future. There is every reason to apprehend that as and when any additional IISER would be announced, Bhubaneswar will not be one of them, as many would then argue for a regional balance. Therefore, in a sense, the PM’s order is contributive to regional imbalance.

Candidly speaking, Orissa may not have any objection against Kolkata getting the IISER, if the NIS offered to her in 2003 is not withdrawn. To ascertain if Orissa is affected by the PM’s order, we from orissamatters.com had posted a query at the e-mail address of the PMO. It was addressed to the Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister and was worded as follows, keeping in mind the highest limit of 500 characters:
“Dear Pr. Secretary to Prime Minister,
On 09/12/03 Orissa was offered a National Institute of Sciences (NIS)

Before it materialized, the PM has cleared an IISER for Kolkata (PIB 28 Sept 05)

Please inform: Is NIS offered to Orissa withdrawn in context of IISER cleared for Kolkata?

PM’s decision being conducive to regional imbalance and tension, clarification is needed for proper reporting”.

We are shocked to see that the PMO is not opening up as yet. Therefore, we have every reason to fear that the NIS offered to Orissa is dropped in a clumsy manner.

It is beyond all logic and acceptability that Government of India changes an educational investment decision made by an earlier government, especially related to a state like Orissa, which has, as shown above, been kept bereft of any super-specialty central institute of higher education, particularly in the field of Science and Technology. If the PM’s September order connotes to withdrawal of NIS offered to Orissa in the context of IISER cleared for Kolkata, it will certainly be disastrous to healthy growth of academic facilities in the Country.

A PTI report filed on 28 September 2005 informed that while releasing the first report on the country’s performance in the area of science, the PM had enumerated how all round progress of the country was affected by lack of balanced distribution of academic facilities. “I trust our government as well the state governments will take note of these findings and evolve policies to remedy these regional imbalances”, he was quoted to have said. It is, therefore, specifically surprising that he, while clearing the IISER for Kolkata on the very same day, failed to see how his own action in jettisoning the NIS announced for Orissa would worsen regional imbalance.

West Bengal in whose favour one of the IISERs is cleared by the PM has an IIT in Kharagpur, a central University in Shanti Niketan, two additional institutes of national importance in an IIM and an Indian Statistical Institute (ISI), and three autonomous science and technology institutions established in Kolkata.

If not under a spell, how has the PM obliterated Orissa’s legitimate due for an IISER if that stands for the NIS?

Keeping mum in this matter is not becoming of the Prime Minister of the Country.

Oriya Language created Orissa and therefore Orissa must be ruled by Oriya Language

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik seems to have developed a wrong notion that governance of Orissa in Oriya depends upon his mercy. His press-note of December 17 and full page display advertisement in major broadsheets of today force us to arrive at this apprehension.

In his December 17 press note it was declared that he had held a meeting with the five members of the ministerial committee on that day for the purpose of “strictly implementing the Orissa Official Language Act, 1954 in official and non-official level” to facilitate which a website has been floated by the government. In the full page multi-color advertisement in broadsheet dailies today, this is intriguingly missing.

The advertisement is designed to tell the people that Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik has taken historical steps to save and develop Oriya language, and has enumerated the steps he has taken. This is blatant lie. Neither he nor his government has executed any single item claimed to be “historical” in the official advertisement. The entire advertisement is nothing but false propaganda. What a shame it is, that, the people of Orissa are taken for granted by their Chief Minister! Read more →

Navakalevara: Legends and reality

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Legends are the most misguiding mischief aimed at superimposing lies on reality so that indigenous people of an occupied land are kept too dazzled to see the dark face of the rulers and the class of exploiters can keep its victims subjugated to its authority, while forcing them to forget the heroic history of evolution of their own philosophy of life, their own splendid spiritual realizations, their own socio-economic uniqueness, their own ancient culture, their own valorous past, their own way of social integration and their own civilization.

We see this mischief galore in the context of Navakalevara of SriJagannatha.

So, here, we are to rip apart the legends and bring the reality of the Navakalevara to light, as thereby alone we can reach the lost uniqueness of the people of Orissa.

We will use Puri Sankaracharya’s self-proclaimed authority over Navakalevara to proceed with our purpose.

  Read more →

Samaja in Maze of Forgery: Two former Ministers of Orissa – Lingaraj Mishra & Radhanath Rath forged the WILL of Gopabandhu; Both benefitted till their death; SoPS continues to Loot

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

The Oriya daily SAMAJA founded by late Utkalmani Pandit Gopabandhu Das, to which, out of their love and reverence for the great humanitarian leader, the people of Orissa had and have been giving their financial and moral support, is in a menacing maze of forgery and loot.

Sadly, two of Gopabandhu’s trusted men – Lingaraj Mishra and Radhanath Rath – who, because of being known so, had the opportunity of becoming cabinet ministers in Orissa, were the masterminds and/or makers of the forgery from which the paper is yet to be salvaged.

Both of them – Lingaraj and Radhanath – had partnered with each other in forging the last WILL of Gopabandhu to grab the Samaja, which being Gopabandhu’s paper was of superb credibility and the greatest political instrument of the day. They had performed this crime behind the screen of and in nexus with Servants of the People Society (SoPS), of which, while breathing his last, Gopabandhu was the Vice-President. Read more →