OrissaMatters

News. Views.

MELAKA PERHAPS WAS FOUNDED BY ORISSA’S FORGOTTEN PRINCE HAMVIRA

January 10th, 2003

Subhas Chandra Pattanayak

Melaka is a popular word in Oriya. It means compatibility or reconciling. Members of Oriya nation usually arrange marriages of their daughters and sons by making a melaka of their respective horoscopes to foresee as to how far they would be compatible if married. If melaka is perfect, it is said, MELAKA PADICHHI RAJA JOTAKA, meaning, if married, the couple will be most compatible. So to the Oriyas, the word ‘Melaka’ means compatibility that helps to grow by reconciling and on the basis of cooperation.

It is thrilling to note that 2 degrees north of the equator between Singapore to its south and Kuala Lumpur to its north, there exists a picturesque and historical place called Melaka. It was perhaps the Citadel of Orissa’s forgotten prince Hamvira. It was so named because its founder had conceived it to be a center of reconciling for merchants from various parts of the globe using it as a rest point while sailing the seas and to use it for exchange of merchandises in harmony.

Researchers say that it was founded in the 15th century by Parameswar, who was recognized and honored by the Chinese Emperor as the King of this land. By naming his land as Melaka, he has clearly indicated that he was an Oriya by origin. I guess, he was Parameswara Hamvira.
A legend linked to foundation of Melaka also speaks of Oriya tradition. In Orissa, tradition of establishment of Capitals by many a Prince in the past was associated with weaker animals overpowering stronger ones and then co-existing. History of almost all the Garjats (Ex-Princely States) of Orissa has such a story to say. My own State Tigiria had shifted its Capital to the present town called Nizgarh from the old Capital called Puruna Tigiria as the King had seen a dove overpowering a hawk on the spot in the new place. A similar story is linked to establishment of Melaka. It is tale of the hunting dogs being overpowered by a mouse deer. The story has been adopted by the Government as the official version of origin of Melaka, as it means it is where even the weak can triumph over the strong. How similar to Oriya tradition!
But who is this Parameswar? Is he the illustrious eldest son of Gajapati Kapilendra Dev of Orissa, Hamvira, obliterated from history under Brahminical conspiracies? Probably.

Though there is difference in year of occurrence, both the events: Hamvira�s disappearance from Orissa and establishment of Melaka belong to the same century. We can ignore the difference, as annals those days were not meticulously noted.

Noted historian Prof. K.C.Panigrahi laments, “This valiant son of Kapilendra had taken a great part in building up an empire for his father, but he appears as a tragic figure in Orissan history”.

It may be noted that Kapilendra, an ordinary cultivator, had raised a mass revolution against caste apartheid to which the non-Oriya king of Orissa in collaboration with the non-Oriya Brahmins had subjected the toiling people and had succeeded to snatch away the throne from the said king.

In order to terminate the exploitative tenets of Brahminism, he had obliterated caste consideration in partaking ‘Prasad’ of Sri Jagannath and encouraged propagation of the Deity as Lard Buddha.

He had adopted Buddhism in its applied sense and therefore declared his clan to be Sun clan as that was the clan name of Buddha. He had hit hard at the root of Brahminism by eliminating caste apartheid, by promulgating that there should be no caste discrimination in places of worship and no caste preference in promotion to higher ranks in the Army.

In order to save people from scriptural exploitation, he had dismissed Sanskrit as official language and promulgated Oriya in its place. He had encouraged writings in Oriya language and depiction of Buddha as Sri Jagannatha in Oriya literature. Dedicating the State to Sri Jagannatha he had declared himself as a servant of Him and made this decision permanent and non-revocable.

In all these matters, his eldest son Hamvira was his most loyal and obedient associate.

Therefore, when Kapilendra became too old to handle the reign, the Brahmins had tried to revive their hegemony with the help of Mangula Rai, a son begotten to him through a Brahmin woman. Keeping Kapilendra under arrest in a southern fort of his empire, they declared him the new emperor. And, made a propaganda that under orders of Sri Jagannatha, emperor Kapilendra discarded Hamvira and preferred Mangula to take over reigns of the empire. According to Sri Jagannatha’s wishes, Mangla Rai was to be called as Purusottama Dev, they informed. Latter to convince the people of Orissa that there was no mischief in this, legend of Manika Gauduni was concocted.

This Purusottama is known to history as a great patron of Brahminism and the destroyer of Buddhist principles that his father Kapilendra had introduced to administration.

Prof. Panigrahi, in a sense agrees to this inference, when in ‘History of Orissa’ he says, “through machinations he (Hamvira) was deprived of inheriting any part of his father’s empire. But, this led to a war of succession in which Hamvira was defeated and was forced to seek the help of the Bahamani Sultan”, he says. And he also says, “even when he was in the camp of the sultan, he sent secret messages to Purusottama to assist him to maintain his position at Kondapalli and to conquer the territories which had been lost to the Sultan”.

Prof. Panigrahi’s notes seem self-contradictory. If Hamvira had led a war against Purusottama, why should have he besought the latter’s help even while staying in the Sultan’s camp?

Prof. Panigrahi has rightly said that Hamvira was ‘valiant’ and it is he who had helped his father build up the empire when there is “absolutely no evidence that Purusottama had ever taken part in any of the wars”. So, it is not acceptable that Hamvira had raised a war of succession against Purusottama. Had he wanted, he could have attacked and defeated the design that had dethroned Kapilendra and debarred him from legitimate succession.

But, perhaps, love for his father could not allow him to indulge in fratricide.

Disgusted, he perhaps left his motherland with his equally able son Kumar Kapileswar Mahapatra in search of avenues elsewhere and landed in the Malayasian straits, whereto his loyal subjects from Orissa (known then as Kalinga) had earlier discovered the route. And therefore, perhaps, there is no trace of Hamvira and Kapileswar in Orissa, even in India, after Purusottam’s emergence as Orissa’s Gajapati emperor.

Most probably, Hamvira had assumed the epithet of Parameswara.

It is a peculiarity with Oriya national character to think big and to become big.

Hence, Orissa’s sea is Mahodadhi, meaning biggest amongst the seas; Orissa’s river is Mahanadi, meaning biggest amongst the rivers; Orissa’s national deity is Jagannatha, meaning the biggest Master of the Universe; His temple is Bad Deula, meaning the biggest amongst the temples, His road is Bada danda, meaning biggest amongst the roads!

Mark Kapilendra. He was a mere cultivator of no clan heritage. But after occupying power, he wanted him to be known as Suryabamshi or of the Sun clan, the Sun (Buddha in Orissa) being the most revered.

Many kings of Orissa had assumed epithets suggesting their highest positions; such as Mahameghabahan, Mahamandaleswara, Parama Maheswara, Parama Bhagavata etc.

On this tradition, Hamvira might have assumed the epithet of Parameswara. His cultural aversion to Brahminism might have taken him first to Bahamani Sultan when in India and ultimately to the fold of Islam as it is recognized by history that Parameswara became Iskandar Shah and his son, known as Sri Maharaj, became Sultan Mohammed Shah.

It is noteworthy that the founder royal of Melaka was inspecting the land sitting on a Tanjung that was carried by his subjects. Tanjung means seat of power. Orissa’s Gajapati Maharaj visits Sri Jagannatha’s Temple or Car even today sitting on a special chair called Tanjan. This similarity between these two words makes it abundantly clear that King Parameswara, who had founded Melaka was none but the Prince from Orissa.

It may be noted that Tanjung Keling, meaning Indian cape in Melaka is so named because merchants from Kalinga had established it.

“Keling is derived from Kalinga, the name of a place in India where the early Indian trader to Melaka came from. Now the word is considered as a very crude way of referring to a person of the Indian race. And this is why the place is known as Tanjung Keling meaning Indian Cape”, says Dennis DeWitt of Melaka in his family website.

It is time, Orissa’s Universities or Government should support projects to find out who the founder king of Melaka, Parameswara really was. Perhaps, thereby, details of what happened to Hamvira after Purusottama Dev took over the reigns of Orissa as well as the last days of Kapilendra Dev, the first Oriya commoner to have become our emperor by freeing our Motherland from non-Oriya rulers and the first ever ruler to have promulgated our mother tongue as language of administration and the first emperor to have made our spiritual and military organizations free from caste influence, could come to light.

Feel free to share Orissa Matters articles!:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
Posted by Subhas C Pattanayak Filed in history

One Response to “MELAKA PERHAPS WAS FOUNDED BY ORISSA’S FORGOTTEN PRINCE HAMVIRA”

  1. OrissaMatters » Blog Archive » MAHODADHI MUST REPLACE BAY OF BENGAL IN ORISSA REGION Says:
    April 29th, 2008 at 6:23 pm

    [...] of the Straits between Singapore to its south and Kuala Lumpur to its north by an Oriya prince, probably Hamvira (known there as Hang Tuah), which as far back as the early 15th century, had become a metropolis [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Subhas Chandra Pattanayak Representative-in-Chief

    Saswat Pattanayak
    Content Editor


  • Syndicate

    • RSS Feed
    • Subscribe to Bloglines
    • Subscribe to MyYahoo!
    • Subscribe to Google Reader
    • Subscribe to MyMSN
    • Subscribe to MyAOL
    • Subscribe to Rojo
    • Subscribe to FeedLounge
    • Subscribe to Newsgator
    • Subscribe to Netvibes
    • Help with feeds
  • Recent Posts

    • INVOLVE SCHOOLS AND ELIMINATE ILLITERACY
    • DISMANTLE INDIRA GANDHI PARK TO RESTORE THE DEMOCRACY POINT
    • HIGHEST JUDICIARY SHOULDN’T SHY AT PEOPLES’ RIGHT TO INFORMATION
    • CAPITALISTS IN QUAGMIRE: GANDHIJI’S THEORY OF TRUSTEESHIP MAY GIVE A TEMPORARY REPRIEVE
    • DON’T MAKE MOCKERY OF MAY DAY; GUESS, IF YOU CAN, WHAT MAY HAPPEN ONE DAY
    • ORISSA UNDER THE CLIMATE OF CRIME
    • AJIT ADDS STRENGTH TO DISCOVERY OF TRUTH ON BUDDHA’S BIRTHPLACE
    • MAHODADHI MUST REPLACE BAY OF BENGAL IN ORISSA REGION
    • IT PORTENDS JUDICIAL ANARCHY
    • NEED INTEREST-FREE FINANCE? SATISFY A BJP MINISTER, LOOT AN OFFICIAL INSTITUTE
  • Archives

    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • September 2004
    • July 2004
    • April 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • August 2002
    • July 2002
    • June 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    • March 2002
    • February 2002
    • January 2002
    • December 2001
    • November 2001
  • Activism/Freelance

    • Media Bistro
    • Media Bloggers
    • Poynter Online
    • Reporters Sans Frontiers
    • Society of Professional Journalists
    • The Independent Journalist
  • Alternative Media

    • Amrita Thinks…
    • IISER Blog
    • Saswat.com
    • Tehelka
    • Tom Paine
    • Whose Media
  • International Media

    • Economist
    • International Herald Tribune
    • New York Times
    • OrissaLinks
    • Washington Post
  • Local Media

    • Dharitri
    • Pragativadi
    • Samaja
    • Sambad
  • National Media

    • Hindustan Times
    • India Today
    • Indian Express-East/South
    • Indian Express-North/West
    • Outlook
    • The Hindu
    • The Pioneer
    • The Statesman
    • The Telegraph
    • Times of India
  • Useful Links

    • Personal Finance Window
  •  

    January 2003
    M T W T F S S
    « Dec   Feb »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • RSS Unknown Feed

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Whose Media?

    • We?ve Moved
    • Apple - Thoughts on Music
    • Zero-sum game
    • Lockheed Stock and Two Smoking Barrels
    • Capital in the Capitol: The Power Politics of Money
  • Admin

    • Login
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • New Oriya Site


  • Visit my family
    Join the Dogster community
  • OrissaMatters is edited by Saswat Pattanayak All Content Copyright 2001-2006 The News Syndicate. (Regn. # 17013/1847 of 1979-80) Office: VR-32, Unit-6, Bhubaneswar 751001, Orissa, India